UNLOCKING MATHEMATICS ENTHUSIASM: ANALYZING FOURTH-GRADE STUDENTS' LEARNING INTEREST

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v11i1.3556

Keywords:

learning interest, mathematics education, elementary school, learning paradox, conceptual understanding

Abstract

Students’ interest in learning mathematics at the elementary level is often reported as suboptimal. This study aims to describe the mathematics learning interest profile of fourth-grade students in Tasikmalaya City. Employing a quantitative approach with descriptive method, the research involved 118 students from SDN 1 Pengadilan and SDN Saripin, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a mathematics learning interest questionnaire with four indicators: emotion, value, knowledge, and engagement, then analyzed using descriptive statistics. The findings revealed an average mathematics learning interest score of 65.39% (moderate category). Per-indicator analysis showed significant imbalances: the value indicator demonstrated the highest results, while the knowledge indicator showed the lowest performance. A notable finding is the learning paradox evidenced by a 14.15% gap between value and knowledge indicators, suggesting students recognize mathematics' importance yet struggle to master fundamental concepts. The study recommends transforming instructional approaches from procedural to meaningful conceptual understanding, creating positive learning environments to enhance emotional engagement, and implementing student-centered learning to increase active participation. These findings provide important insights for improving mathematics education quality at the elementary level.

Author Biography

  • Dr. Lutfi Nur, S.Pd., M.Pd., M.M., Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

    Dr. Lutfi Nur, S.Pd., M.Pd., M.M., serves as Vice Director for Education, Student Affairs, and Quality Assurance at the Tasikmalaya Campus of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia.

References

Anita, I. W. (2014). Pengaruh kecemasan matematika (mathematics anxiety) terhadap kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa SMP. Infinity Journal, 3(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v3i1.43

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

Hannula, M. S. (2012). Exploring new dimensions of mathematics-related affect: Embodied and social theories. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.694281

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

Permata, B., Netson, H., & Ain, S. Q. (2021). Factors Causing Difficulty in Learning Mathematics for Elementary School Students. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(1), 134–141. https://dx.doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v6i1

Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Shields, P. M., & Rangarajan, N. (2013). A Playbook for Research Methods: Integrating Conceptual Frameworks and Project Management. New Forums Press.

Suraji, Maimunah, & Saragih, S. (2018). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMP pada materi sistem persamaan linear dua variabel (SPLDV). Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v4i1.5057

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach ’ s alpha. 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001

Yuniyanto, E., Syamsuri, S., Hendrayana, A., & Hadi Firdos Santosa, C. A. (2022). Analisis Minat Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas Virtual Di Smp. Wilangan: Jurnal Inovasi Dan Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.56704/jirpm.v3i2.13256

Yuwana, C. A. R., Ariyanto, L., & Harun, L. (2023). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Pocket Book Berbasis Kearifan Lokal untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa SMP. JIPMat (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v8i1.14442

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27