ANALYSIS OF PSEUDO THINKING PROCESS SKILLS IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH ETHNOMATHEMATICS BASED PROBLEM SOLVING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v9i2.484Keywords:
Ethnomathematics, Problem Solving, Pseudo ThinkingAbstract
This research aims to analyze process skills in pseudo-thinking through ethnomathematics-based problem solving in elementary school students. The subjects used in this research were 4 students from class IVB of SD Negeri 76 Muaro Jambi involving 4 subjects, namely 2 male and female subjects who thought pseudo-true and 2 male and female subjects who thought pseudo-false. Data collection techniques in this research used tests, interviews and documentation. Data analysis used in this research includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The research procedures carried out in this research include the pre-field stage, field work stage, and data analysis stage. The results of the study stated that the four subjects showed various characteristics in using pseudo thinking patterns when answering mathematics questions. Each subject has abilities in several aspects of process skills in pseudo-true thinking, such as observing information, however, they still have shortcomings and difficulties in explaining the calculation process, communicating results, and understanding mathematical concepts as a whole. Consequently, further development is required to improve their processing skills in pseudo-thinking.
References
Dewi, A. S., Isnani, I., & Ahmadi, A. (2019). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Stad Berbantuan Media Pembelajaran Terhadap Sikap Dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. JIPMat, 4(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v4i1.3509
Fuady, A. (2017). Berfikir Reflektif Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. JIPMat, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v1i2.1236
Gunawan, Harjono, A., Hermansyah, & Herayanti, L. (2019). Guided inquiry model through virtual laboratory to enhance students’ science process skills on heat concept. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.23345
Jatmiko, J. (2018). Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Memahami Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. JIPMat, 3(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v3i1.2285
Kamid, K., Rohati, R., Rahmalisa, Y., Anggo, M., Septi, S. E., Azzahra, M. Z., & Nawahdani, A. M. (2021). Engklek Game” in mathematics: How difference and relationship student attitude towards science process skills? Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(6), 3109–3123. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i6.6500
Mauleto, K. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Indikator Nctm Dan Aspek Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Di Kelas 7B Smp Kanisius Kalasan. JIPMat, 4(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v4i2.4261
Mawaddah, S., & Anisah, H. (2015). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakag) di SMPn Model Pembelajaran Generatif (Generative Learning) di SMP. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v3i2.644
Rafiah, H., Saufi, M., Aulia, S., & Riadi, A. (2018). Berpikir pseudo mahasiswa PGSD pada operasi bilangan bulat. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v4i1.78
Rasudi, R., Ariswoyo, S., & Mujib, A. (2021). Analisis Berpikir Pseudo Penalaran Kovariasi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Limit Fungsi. Jurnal Mathematic Paedagogic, 6(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.36294/jmp.v6i1.2382
Ratnaningdyah, D. (2018). Mengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika dengan Metode the Three-Tier Test. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 533–540. https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/Prosidingpps/article/view/1948
Rosidin, U., Kadaritna, N., & Hasnunidah, N. (2019). Can argument-driven inquiry models have impact on critical thinking skills for students with differentpersonality types? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.24725
Sariningsih, R., & Purwasih, R. (2017). Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Dan Self Efficacy Mahasiswa Calon Guru. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 1(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v1i1.275
Septria, R., Kamid, K., & Saharudin, S. (2021). Analisis Berpikir Pseudo pada Siswa Autisme dalam Memecahkan Soal Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1090–1101. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.593
Sopamena, P., Mastuti, A. G., & Hukom, J. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Berpikir Pseudo Siswa dalam Mengkonstruksi Konsep Limit Fungsi Pada Siswa Kelas XII IPA SMA Negeri 11 Ambon. Prosiding SEMNAS Matematika & Pendidikan Matematika IAIN Ambon, October, 209–215.
Subanji, R., & Supratman, A. M. (2015). The Pseudo-Covariational Reasoning Thought Processes in Constructing Graph Function of Reversible Event Dynamics Based on Assimilation and Accommodation Frameworks. Research in Mathematical Education, 19(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmed.2015.19.1.61
Subanji, S., & Nusantara, T. (2016). Thinking Process of Pseudo Construction in Mathematics Concepts. International Education Studies, 9(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n2p17
Susanto, N. C. P., Hartati, S. J., & Setiawan, W. (2022). Desain Pembelajaran Peningkatan Literasi Numerasi Dan Karakter Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sd Berbasis Etnomatematika. Center Of Education Journal (CEJou), 3(01), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.55757/cejou.v3i01.93
Wibawa, K. (2016). Karakteristik Berpikir Pseudo Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. March, 0–16. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3907.3528
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tasya Kurnia Safira, Kamid Kamid, Khairul Anwar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.