Evaluation of Learning Management System for Users with Accessibility Needs Using Extended Technology Acceptance Model (E-TAM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i1.2495Keywords:
learning management system, students with disabilities, Technology Adoption, e-learning accessibility, quantitative analysisAbstract
Inclusive education aims to provide equal learning opportunities for students with special needs, including the use of a Learning Management System (LMS). The urgency of this research stems from the significant challenges in LMS accessibility, which pose major obstacles for students with disabilities. These challenges include difficult navigation, a lack of screen reader features, and unfriendly interface design. The objectives of the research are to identify and evaluate the factors of LMS acceptance by students with disabilities and provide recommendations. The method uses the Extended Technology Acceptance Model (E-TAM) to identify factors influencing the acceptance of LMS by students with disabilities, such as perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and external factors. The findings indicate that System Quality (SQ) has no significant influence on Attitude Toward Using (AT), with the estimated effect size being 1.4%. As an implication, the institutions need to provide easy-to-follow guides to help users with disabilities.
References
[1] Yustina Trihartatik, Bunyamin YY. Development of an Inclusive Education Model Based on Stakeholder Collaboration in Pangdi Luhur Elementary School Semarang. Sosioedukasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sosial 2025;14:2793–802. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6485.
[2] Nurjanah SA, Ayuningtyas F. Analysis of the Use of Digital Media in Online Learning for Down Syndrome Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. INKLUSI 2024;11:125–38. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.110201.
[3] Niqotaini Z. Analisis Penerimaan dan Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Augmented Reality Dengan Menggunakan Model UTAUT-2 (Studi Kasus : Smp Dan Sma Mutiara Bunda Bandung). Technologia: Jurnal Ilmiah 2021;12:4. https://doi.org/10.31602/tji.v12i1.4175.
[4] Maknun L, Annaafi’atsaani I, Ikhrom I. Developing the Extraordinary Potential: Inclusive Education as the Key to Developing the Talent of Children with Special Needs. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 2024;4:165–76. https://doi.org/10.14421/njpi.2024.v4i1-10.
[5] Seta HB, Theresiawati T, Niqotaini Z, Trahira JI, Assegaf NN. Push-Pull-Mooring Theory and The Moderating Effect of Inertia on Switching Intention to Mobile Learning. JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization 2025;9:1881. https://doi.org/10.62527/joiv.9.5.2867.
[6] Abdul Haris Indrakusuma, PUTRI AR. E-Learning –Teori dan Desain. Tulungngagung: STKIP PGRI; 2016.
[7] Utomo U, Kusumastuti DE, Misliyani M. Utilization of E-Learning Based on Learning Management System (LMS) for College Students with Special Needs During Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Luar Biasa 2021;8:7. https://doi.org/10.17977/um029v8i12021p7-16.
[8] Dwi Fithriyaningrum, Kusumawardani SS, Wibirama S. Accessibility Analysis of Learning Management System Websites. IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development) 2022;11:162–71. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijid.2022.3485.
[9] Karovska Ristovska A, Rashikj-Canevska O, Tasevska A, Bruziene R, Orechova M, Paiva Dias G, et al. Accessible Learning Management Systems: Students’ Experiences and Insights. PRIZREN SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL 2021;5:1–13. https://doi.org/10.32936/pssj.v5i2.224.
[10] Kusuma T, Widodo AP, Nugraheni DMK. Analysis of Service Package Improvement Factors by Users of Fingerprint Analysis Applications Using TAM and EUCS Methods. Scientific Journal of Informatics 2025;12:99–106.
[11] Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13:319–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
[12] Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 1989;35:982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
[13] Niqotaini Z, Zaidiah A, Isnainiyah IN. Integrating TAM and EUCS Model for Academic Faculty Website Analysis Method. 2024 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS), IEEE; 2024, p. 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMCIS63449.2024.10956220.
[14] Zhang H, Liu Y, Gui F, Yang X. A Universal Aquaculture Environmental Anomaly Monitoring System. Sustainability 2023;15:5678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075678.
[15] Alazemi B, Larkins R. Teachers’ Perceptions of Preparedness for Teaching Students with Mild to Moderate Disabilities in Inclusive Education in Kuwait. International Journal of Special Education (IJSE) 2025;40:1–12. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2025.40.1.
[16] Niqotaini Z. Analisis Penerimaan Google Classroom Menggunakan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Dan End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) (Studi Kasus: Universitas Informatika Dan Bisnis Indonesia). SISTEMASI 2021;10:637. https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v10i3.1376.
[17] Irvan M, Damayanto A, Jauhari MN, Aqilah TS. The Effectiveness Factors of Online Learning Through Learning Management System for Students with Disabilities. 2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET), IEEE; 2021, p. 107–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575082.
[18] Song Y. The Effect of Web-Based Communication to Internet Users of Information Characteristics : Focus on Internalization and Conformity. Journal of Digital Convergence 2016;14:117–26. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.7.117.
[19] F. Hair Jr J, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, G. Kuppelwieser V. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review 2014;26:106–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.
[20] Hanjaya STM, Kenny SK, Gunawan SSSEF. Understanding Factors influencing Consumers Online Purchase intention Via Mobile App: Perceived Ease of use, Perceived Usefulness, System Quality, information Quality, and Service Quality. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations 2019;32:175–205. https://doi.org/10.2478/minib-2019-0035.
[21] Sari AP, Syamsuddin MA. Analisis Faktor End-User Computing Satisfaction Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna : Studi Kasus Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Madya Balikpapan. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia 2017;1:92–101.
[22] Loanata T, Tileng KG. Pengaruh Trust dan Perceived Risk pada Intention To Use Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (Studi Kasus Pada Situs E-Commerce Traveloka). JUISI Jurnal Informatika Dan Sistem Informasi 2016;02:10.
[23] Tamami FQA, Maksum MNR, Rahmawati S, Anwari A. Islamic Education for Disabilities: Exploring Psychological Approaches through Bibliometric Analysis. Multicultural Islamic Education Review 2024;2:45–58. https://doi.org/10.23917/mier.v2i1.4487.
[24] Ashadi K, Ariani LPT, Pulungan KA, Womsiwor D, Sandi N, Zolkafi MAA. Towards Inclusive Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Scopus Evidence on Multidimensional Barriers in Physical and Intellectual Disabilities. Physical Education Theory and Methodology 2025;25:983–91. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2025.4.28.
[25] Rahmawati RN, Narsa IM. Penggunaan e-learning dengan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan 2019;6:127–36. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v6i2.26232.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Advance Sustainable Science Engineering and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
