In Vitro Degradation and Mechanical Performance of Mg AZ31B for Biodegradable Bone Implant Applications

Authors

  • Slamet Saefudin Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang Indonesia
  • Purnomo Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang Indonesia
  • Muhammad Subri Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang Indonesia
  • M. Edi Pujianto Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang Indonesia
  • Ilham Yustar Afif Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang Indonesia
  • Samsudi Raharjo Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i2.2652

Keywords:

Biomaterial, Magnesium AZ31B, biodegradable implants, mechanical integrity, corrosion

Abstract

Magnesium AZ31B is a promising biodegradable implant material due to its mechanical properties comparable to natural bone and its ability to degrade in physiological environments, potentially eliminating the need for secondary surgery. However, its rapid degradation can cause a significant loss of mechanical integrity, limiting its use in load-bearing applications. This study investigates the evolution of mechanical properties and surface characteristics of AZ31B during in-vitro immersion in Simulated Body Fluid (SBF). Tensile tests were conducted on triplicate specimens after immersion for 3, 6, and 9 days, while surface morphology and corrosion products were analyzed using SEM–EDX. In addition, pH variation and mass loss were monitored to evaluate corrosion behavior. The results show a progressive decrease in tensile strength from 279.77 ± 5.30 MPa (0 days) to 167.64 ± 2.31 MPa after 9 days of immersion, representing an overall reduction of approximately 40%. This degradation was accompanied by increased surface corrosion, mass loss, and solution alkalization. These findings provide quantitative insight into the relationship between corrosion progression and mechanical degradation of AZ31B, highlighting its time-dependent performance limitations and the need for surface modification strategies in biodegradable implant applications.

Author Biographies

  • Slamet Saefudin, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

    Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No. 18 Semarang 50273, Central Java, Indonesia

  • Purnomo, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

    Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No. 18 Semarang 50273, Central Java, Indonesia

  • Muhammad Subri, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

    Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No. 18 Semarang 50273, Central Java, Indonesia

  • M. Edi Pujianto, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

    Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No. 18 Semarang 50273, Central Java, Indonesia

  • Ilham Yustar Afif, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

    Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No. 18 Semarang 50273, Central Java, Indonesia

  • Samsudi Raharjo, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

    Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No. 18 Semarang 50273, Central Java, Indonesia

References

[1] Ali S, Irfan M, Niazi UM, Rani AMA, Rashedi A, Rahman S, et al. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Modified 316L Stainless Steel Alloy for Biomedical Applications Using Powder Metallurgy. Materials 2022;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082822.

[2] Gatto ML, Cerqueni G, Groppo R, Santecchia E, Tognoli E, Defanti S, et al. Improved biomechanical behavior of 316L graded scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration produced by laser powder bed fusion. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2023;144:105989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105989.

[3] Baltatu MS, Vizureanu P, Sandu AV, Solcan C, Hritcu LD, Spataru MC. Research Progress of Titanium-Based Alloys for Medical Devices. Biomedicines 2023;11:2997. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11112997.

[4] Benea L, Simionescu-Bogatu N. Reactivity and corrosion behaviors of ti6al4v alloy implant biomaterial under metabolic perturbation conditions in physiological solutions. Materials 2021;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237404.

[5] Vishnu J, Kesavan P, Shankar B, Dembińska K, Swiontek Brzezinska M, Kaczmarek-Szczepańska B. Engineering Antioxidant Surfaces for Titanium-Based Metallic Biomaterials. Journal of Functional Biomaterials 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14070344.

[6] Li H, Wang M, Lou D, Xia W, Fang X. Microstructural features of biomedical cobalt–chromium–molybdenum (CoCrMo) alloy from powder bed fusion to aging heat treatment. Journal of Materials Science and Technology 2020;45:146–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.11.031.

[7] Lohberger B, Eck N, Glaenzer D, Lichtenegger H, Ploszczanski L, Leithner A. Cobalt chromium molybdenum surface modifications alter the osteogenic differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells. Materials 2020;13:4292. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA13194292.

[8] Tan J, Ramakrishna S. Applications of magnesium and its alloys: A review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156861.

[9] Nasr Azadani M, Zahedi A, Bowoto OK, Oladapo BI. A review of current challenges and prospects of magnesium and its alloy for bone implant applications. Progress in Biomaterials 2022;11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-022-00182-x.

[10] Amukarimi S, Mozafari M. Biodegradable magnesium-based biomaterials: An overview of challenges and opportunities. MedComm 2021;2:123–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.59.

[11] Saefudin S, Cahyandari D, Afif IY, Raharjo S, Purnomo P, Amin M. Increasing the Surface Roughness of Magnesium AZ31B using Sandblasting for the Preparation of Biodegradable Implant Materials. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 3250, 2025, p. 070006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0240666.

[12] Saha S, Lestari W, Dini C, Sarian MN, Hermawan H, Barão VAR, et al. Corrosion in Mg-alloy biomedical implants- the strategies to reduce the impact of the corrosion inflammatory reaction and microbial activity. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys 2022;10:3306–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2022.10.025.

[13] He M, Chen L, Yin M, Xu S, Liang Z. Review on magnesium and magnesium-based alloys as biomaterials for bone immobilization. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 2023;23:4396–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.037.

[14] Candan S, Emir S, Candan E. In Vitro Degradation Behavior of Ti-Microalloyed AZ31 Magnesium Alloy in Simulated Body Fluid. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 2022;31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06142-z.

[15] Merino E, El Tawil M, Sobrados I, Durán A, Castro Y. In-vitro degradation behavior of hybrid epoxy-alkyl sol–gel/anodized composite coating on AZ31B Mg alloy. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology 2025;114:139–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-022-06012-7.

[16] Amin A, Williams B, McGehee T, Navarro A, Patil V, Elsaadany M, et al. In vitro comparative study of composite coatings for magnesium-based bone implants. Results in Surfaces and Interfaces 2025;18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsurfi.2025.100460.

[17] Predoi D, Iconaru SL, Predoi MV, Motelica-Heino M, Buton N, Megier C. Obtaining and characterizing thin layers of magnesium doped hydroxyapatite by dip coating procedure. Coatings 2020;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/COATINGS10060510.

[18] Zhu Y, Liu W, Ngai T. Polymer coatings on magnesium-based implants for orthopedic applications. Journal of Polymer Science 2022;60:32–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20210578.

[19] Wang G, Wei Y, Hong J, Lv J. Spray-synthesized organic composite/hydroxyapatite coating on magnesium alloys with enhanced corrosion resistance. Frontiers in Chemistry 2025;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2025.1566676.

[20] Knigge S, Mueller M, Fricke L, Schilling T, Glasmacher B. In Vitro Investigation of Corrosion Control of Magnesium with Degradable Polycaprolactone Coatings for Cardiovascular Grafts. Coatings 2023;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13010094.

[21] Hu MH, Yang KC, Chen CW, Chu PH, Chang YL, Sun YH, et al. Multilayer Electrospun-Aligned Fibroin/Gelatin Implant for Annulus Fibrosus Repair: An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation. Biomedicines 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092107.

[22] ASTM B557-15 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing Wrought and Cast Aluminum- and Magnesium-Alloy Products. ASTM Book of Standards 2016;2.02:1–16.

[23] Kokubo T, Takadama H. Simulated Body Fluid (SBF) as a Standard Tool to Test the Bioactivity of Implants. Handbook of Biomineralization: Biological Aspects and Structure Formation 2008;3:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527619443.ch51.

[24] ASTM G31-21. Standard Guide for Laboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing of Metals. ASTM International n.d.

[25] ASTM G1–03. Standard Practice for Preparing, Cleaning, and Evaluating Corrosion Test Specimens. ASTM International 2017.

[26] Xu L, Liu X, Sun K, Fu R, Wang G. Corrosion Behavior in Magnesium-Based Alloys for Biomedical Applications. Materials 2022;15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072613.

[27] Das P, Kumar TSS, Sahu KK, Gollapudi S. Corrosion, stress corrosion cracking and corrosion fatigue behavior of magnesium alloy bioimplants. Corrosion Reviews 2022;40:289–333. https://doi.org/10.1515/corrrev-2021-0088.

[28] Kalatharan SN, Imran AI, Irawan AP, Siregar JP, Cionita T, Fitriyana DF, et al. Mechanical Performance of Alkali-Treated Rattan Strips with Epoxy Coating for Sustainable Composite Applications. Advance Sustainable Science Engineering and Technology 2025;7:02503018. https://doi.org/10.26877/fm53nd79.

[29] Chaudhari YS, Chaudhari MY, Gholap AD, Alam MI, Khalid M, Webster TJ, et al. Surface engineering of nano magnesium alloys for orthopedic implants: a systematic review of strategies to mitigate corrosion and promote bone regeneration. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2025;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1617585.

[30] Merson E, Poluyanov V, Merson D, Myagkikh P. Corrosion Properties of Biodegradable AZ31 and ZK60 Magnesium Alloys: In Situ Study 2021:3. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmdwc2021-09959.

[31] Bütev Öcal E, Esen Z, Aydınol K, Dericioğlu AF. Comparison of the short and long-term degradation behaviors of as-cast pure Mg, AZ91 and WE43 alloys. Materials Chemistry and Physics 2020;241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122350.

[32] Yavuzyegit B, Karali A, De Mori A, Smith N, Usov S, Shashkov P, et al. Evaluation of Corrosion Performance of AZ31 Mg Alloy in Physiological and Highly Corrosive Solutions. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2024;7:1735–47. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.3c01169.

[33] Yu W, Sun R, Guo Z, Wang Z, He Y, Lu G, et al. Novel fluoridated hydroxyapatite/MAO composite coating on AZ31B magnesium alloy for biomedical application. Applied Surface Science 2019;464:708–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.148.

[34] Cheng S, Wang W, Wang D, Li B, Zhou J, Zhang D, et al. An: In vitro and in vivo comparison of Mg(OH)2-, MgF2- and HA-coated Mg in degradation and osteointegration. Biomaterials Science 2020;8:3320–33. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00467g.

[35] Sana A, Malik I, Mujahid M, Akram MA, Adeel Umer M. Surface degradation study of magnesium tested in simulated body fluid. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering 2019;30:341–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-191057.

[36] Lan X, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhang R, Sand W, Zhang L, et al. Corrosion of an AZ31B Magnesium Alloy by Sulfate-Reducing Prokaryotes in a Mudflat Environment. Microorganisms 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10050839.

[37] Shen X, Wang Y, Liu Y, Ding J, Zhai Y, Wang M. Preparation of spherical flower-like Mg(OH)2 from waste magnesite and its immobilization performance for Cu2+, Zn2+and Pb2+. Water Science and Technology 2020;82:2536–44. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.532.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15