Importance–Performance Analysis of Bus Rapid Transit Service Attributes for Passenger Satisfaction and Sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i1.2725Keywords:
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Importance–Performance Analysis (IPA), service quality modeling, public transport engineering, performance gap analysisAbstract
The Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system in Bali serves as a vital component of sustainable urban mobility. This study uniquely integrates Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) with technical recommendations to provide a comprehensive evaluation of BRT performance and its contribution to sustainable transportation. The analysis identifies key service strengths—such as seating comfort, air conditioning, cleanliness, and personnel service quality—that exceed passenger expectations. Conversely, deficiencies are evident in bus stop conditions, accessibility for disabled passengers, punctuality, and environmental sustainability. By linking IPA results with actionable technical strategies, the study recommends upgrading bus stop infrastructure, enhancing accessibility design, implementing real-time scheduling, and tracking systems, transitioning to eco-friendly bus fleets, and strengthening passenger information and security systems. This integrated approach not only highlights priority areas for improvement but also offers a practical roadmap for policymakers and transit authorities to enhance service quality, boost ridership, and advance Bali’s progress toward a resilient and sustainable urban transport system.
References
[1] Aryasih PA, Ruhati D, Puja IBP, Darmiati M, Widiana IW, Mahendra PFK. Investigation of Tourist
Satisfaction with the Public Transporation in Bali. Jurnal Kepariwisataan Indonesia: Jurnal
Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kepariwisataan Indonesia 2024;18:117–40.
[2] Banister D. Unsustainable Transport: City Transport in the New Century. London: Routledge; 2005.
[3] Cervero R. Transit-Oriented Development’s Ridership Bonus: A Product of Self-Selection and
Public Policies. Sage Journals 2007;39. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38377.
[4] Vale D de S. Sustainable urban form, accessibility and travel: The relationship between polycentric
urban development and commuting in Lisbon 2009.
[5] Hermawati1 P, Sudiajeng L, Parwita IGLM. Level of Satisfaction of Urban Bus Rapid Transit Users:
A Case Study of Trans Metro Dewata and Trans Sarbagita in Bali. Proceedings of the International
Conference on Sustainable Green Tourism Applied Science-Engineering Applied Science 2024
(ICoSTAS-EAS 2024), vol. 249, Springer Nature; 2024, p. 313. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-
6463-587-4.
[6] Ibrahim S, Zhang Y, Ahmad A. Rail-based public transportation service quality and customer
satisfaction: a decade of insights and advances. Public Transport 2025:1–25.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-024-00382-7
[7] Esch DT, Mylonopoulos N, Theoharakis V. Evaluating mobile-based data collection for
crowdsourcing behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods 2025;57:106.
[8] Mitric S. Urban transport lending by the World Bank: The last decade. Research in Transportation
Economics 2013;40:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.036
[9] Rasouli S, Timmermans H. Judgments of travel experiences, activity envelopes, trip features and
multi-tasking: A panel effects regression model specification. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract
2014;63:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.02.012
[10] Zhang J, Fujiwara A, Uno M. Is trip-making utility positive or negative?-A preliminary examination
based on day reconstruction method. th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research,
Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, December, 2009, p. 13–8.
[11] Geerlings H, Stead D. The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European
policy and research. Transp Policy (Oxf) 2003;10:187–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-
070X(03)00020-9.
[12] Van Lierop D, El-Geneidy A. Enjoying loyalty: The relationship between service quality, customer
satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit. Research in Transportation Economics
2016;59:50–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2016.04.001.
[13] Banister D. Cities, mobility and climate change. J Transp Geogr 2011;19:1538–46.
[14] Molugaram K, Thabassum S, Kurre P. Road Side Interview (RSI) Technique for calculation of
Traffic growth rates at Micro level. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies
2017;12:556–64. https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.12.5560260107-016
[15] Sekaran SR. Information Technology 4.0 in Accounting and Effect of Industry. Available at SSRN
4712035 2024.
[16] Gwilliam K. Urban transport in developing countries. Transp Rev 2003;23:197–216.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640309893
[17] CHIANG CH, TSENG WC. Study on the Port Selection for Offshore Wind Farms-Perspectives of
Ports in Taiwan. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol. 14, 2023.
[18] Hensher DA, Golob TF. Bus rapid transit systems: A comparative assessment. Transportation
(Amst) 2008;35:501–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-008-9163-y.
[19] Taqia IM, Pancasilawan R. Towards Sustainable Transport Integration: The Implementation of Bus
Rapid Transit and Feeder Transport in Tangerang City. KnE Social Sciences 2025:22–30.
[20] Newman P, Kosonen L, Kenworthy J. Theory of urban fabrics: Planning the walking, transit/public
transport and automobile/motor car cities for reduced car dependency. Town Planning Review
2016;87:429–58. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.28
[21] De Oña J, de Oña R, Eboli L, Forciniti C, Mazzulla G. Transit passengers’ behavioural intentions:
the influence of service quality and customer satisfaction. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science
2016;12:385–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2016.1146365
[22] Newman P, Kenworthy J. Urban transportation patterns and trends in global cities. The end of
automobile dependence: How cities are moving beyond car-based planning, Springer; 2015, p. 33–
76.
[23] ESCAP UN. Strengthening regional direction for the development of smart transport systems in
Asia and the Pacific 2023.
[24] Kassens-Noor E. Book Review: The End of Automobile Dependence: How Cities Are Moving
beyond Car-Based Planning 2017.
[25] ESCAP UN. Increasing the use of smart mobility approaches to improve traffic conditions in urban
areas of South-East Asia: policy guidelines 2022.
