Analysis of Air Shot Blasting Machine Effectiveness using Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v6i3.582Keywords:
Performance effectiveness, machine breakdown, the overall equipment effectivenessAbstract
The effectiveness of a machine is one of the main factors for a production process to run smoothly so that it can meet its demand. Companies must always ensure that their production machines have high effectiveness. The shot blasting machine is one of the production machines used at PT. X. This machine has been in use for quite some time. Additionally, the machine often experiences breakdowns. This study was conducted to measure the effectiveness of the shot blasting machine at PT. X in order to determine its effectiveness. The overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) approach is used here to measure it. The OEE value is influenced by three factors, namely availability, performance, and quality. The result obtained is that the effectiveness of the machine is still quite high, with an OEE value of 81.82% and is still above the standard value for OEE, which is 85%. To enhance OEE, additional steps could involve documenting the issues as they arise, followed by generating a pareto chart to pinpoint the most common problems. This enables directing improvement endeavors towards addressing these significant challenges
References
A. Florescu and S. A. Barabas, “Modeling and simulation of a flexible manufacturing system—A basic component of industry 4.0,” Applied sciences, vol. 10, no. 22, p. 8300, 2020.
M. Subramaniyan, A. Skoogh, J. Bokrantz, M. A. Sheikh, M. Thürer, and Q. Chang, “Artificial intelligence for throughput bottleneck analysis–State-of-the-art and future directions,” J Manuf Syst, vol. 60, pp. 734–751, 2021.
D. Berdik, S. Otoum, N. Schmidt, D. Porter, and Y. Jararweh, “A survey on blockchain for information systems management and security,” Inf Process Manag, vol. 58, no. 1, p. 102397, 2021.
J. Lohmer and R. Lasch, “Production planning and scheduling in multi-factory production networks: a systematic literature review,” Int J Prod Res, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 2028–2054, 2021.
J.-R. Ruiz-Sarmiento, J. Monroy, F.-A. Moreno, C. Galindo, J.-M. Bonelo, and J. Gonzalez-Jimenez, “A predictive model for the maintenance of industrial machinery in the context of industry 4.0,” Eng Appl Artif Intell, vol. 87, p. 103289, 2020.
F. Gauthier et al., “Practices and needs of machinery designers and manufacturers in safety of machinery: An exploratory study in the province of Quebec, Canada,” Saf Sci, vol. 133, p. 105011, 2021.
J. Lee, J. Ni, J. Singh, B. Jiang, M. Azamfar, and J. Feng, “Intelligent maintenance systems and predictive manufacturing,” J Manuf Sci Eng, vol. 142, no. 11, p. 110805, 2020.
Z. T. Xiang and J. F. Chin, “Implementing total productive maintenance in a manufacturing small or medium-sized enterprise,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 152–175, 2021.
L. Fedele, L. Di Vito, and F. E. Ramundo, “Increasing efficiency in an aeronautical engine through maintenance evaluation and upgrades: Analysis of the reliability and performance improvements under financial issues,” Energies (Basel), vol. 13, no. 12, p. 3059, 2020.
X. Zheng, S. Zheng, Y. Kong, and J. Chen, “Recent advances in surface defect inspection of industrial products using deep learning techniques,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 113, pp. 35–58, 2021.
R. Xiong, W. Sun, Q. Yu, and F. Sun, “Research progress, challenges and prospects of fault diagnosis on battery system of electric vehicles,” Appl Energy, vol. 279, p. 115855, 2020.
B. Marfinov and A. J. Pratama, “Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) analysis to minimize six big losses in continuous blanking machine,” IJIEM-Indonesian Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 25, 2020.
C. Edwin and W. M. N. S. Daud, “Improving production system performance using overall equipment effectiveness,” International Journal of Industrial Management, vol. 9, pp. 74–90, 2021.
K. S. Sultan and M. E. Moshref, “Stochastic analysis of a priority standby system under preventive maintenance,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 3861, 2021.
F. Rahman, S. Sugiono, A. A. Sonief, and O. Novareza, “Optimization maintenance performance level through collaboration of overall equipment effectiveness and machine reliability,” Journal of Applied Engineering Science, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 917–936, 2022.
S. L. Fuadiya and E. P. Widjajati, “Analysis of sag mill machine performance using overall equipment effectiveness and failure model and effects analysis method,” International Journal of Industrial Optimization, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 141–153, 2022.
D. Suhendi, D. Santoso, and A. A. Abadi, “Proposed Increasing Effectiveness of Heavy Equipment (Reach Stacker TEREX TFC 45 LX HC) At PT. Krakatau Argo Logistics Using the Total Productivity Maintenance Concept,” Int J Innov Sci Res Technol, vol. 6, no. 8, 2021.
M. Djunaidi, C. Athallaric, and H. Munawir, “The effectiveness level analysis of flask less molding machine using overall equipment effectiveness (oee) as an improvement of machine productivity,” Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 162–168, 2022.
T. H. Lakho, M. A. Khan, S. I. Virk, A. A. Indher, and S. A. Khaskheli, “Evaluation of Overall Equipment Effectiveness in a Heavy Engineering Industry: A Case Study,” in Proceedings of the First Central American and Caribbean International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2021, pp. 363–372.
A. A. Hidayat, M. Kholil, J. Haekal, N. A. Ayuni, and T. Widodo, “Lean Manufacturing Integration in Reducing the Number of Defects in the Finish Grinding Disk Brake with DMAIC and FMEA Methods in the Automotive Sub Industry Company,” International Journal of Scientific Advances ISSN: 2708, vol. 7972, no. 2, p. 5, 2021.
