Reducing Dependence on AI-Generated Text through Contextual Writing Assessment

Authors

  • Yeni Daniarti Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang Indonesia
  • Yanuardi Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v6i2.3902

Keywords:

AI-generated text, contextual writing assessment, academic integrity, learner agency

Abstract

Although generative artificial intelligence (GAI) increasingly impacts academic writing and integrity in higher education, empirical evidence on assessment strategies to reduce students' reliance on AI-generated texts remains limited. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the Contextual Writing Assessment in reducing AI-generated text dependence and improving writing performance, writing originality, academic integrity, and learner agency. A quasi-experimental mixed-methods design with an embedded explanatory approach was employed in an English course at the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Muhammadiyah Tangerang. The participants comprised 150 second-semester students from six classes and four lecturers. Three classes were assigned to the experimental group and received Contextual Writing Assessment, while three classes served as the control group and received the conventional writing assessment. Data were collected through writing tests, AI-dependence questionnaires, academic integrity and learner agency questionnaires, originality scores, AI-use logs, reflective journals, draft analyses, observations, and interviews.  The results demonstrated the effectiveness of the intervention, as the experimental group outperformed the control group in reducing AI-generated text dependence and exhibited substantial improvements in writing performance, originality, academic integrity, and learner agency. Qualitative evidence indicated more transparent AI use, meaningful revisions, stronger reflections, and reduced copy-paste behavior. The study concludes that Contextual Writing Assessment offers an ethical, process-based, and AI-resilient approach to writing assessment.

References

Abolina, A., Zorins, A., Vindaca, O., Usca, S., & Petrushenko, Y. (2026). Transforming Higher Education through AI-enriched Tools: an open innovation approach. Frontiers in Education, 11(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1766004

Asrifan, A., Cardoso, L. M. O. de B., & Vargheese, K. J. (2025). Artificial intelligence in bilingual ESP: A mixed-methods study on English for educational technology. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials, 7(1), 88–112. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v7i1.91274

Daniarti, Y., Firmansyah, M. A., & Alamsyah, D. (2026). Enhancing EFL Listening Through Structured Autonomous Use of British Council Learn English Audio Materials. International Journal of Research in Education, 6(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v6i1.3274

Faridah, F., Luthfiyati, D., & Fatmawaty, R. (2026). Exploring Students ’ acceptance of ChatGPT in Assisting EFL Writing Tasks : A technology acceptance model perspective. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 16(1), 356–379. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v16i1.10378

Fauziah, F., Diana, N., Putri, S., & Fadhli, T. (2025). Student Engagement with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbot in English Language Learning: Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 12(June 2025), 29. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v12i2.4085

Febriyanti, Nurchurifiani, E., Hastomo, T., Wicaksono, A., & Nasution, S. S. (2026). AI Literacy of Pre-Service English Teachers: Proficiency, Strategies, and Barriers. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies) P-ISSN:, 13(April 2026), 32. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v13i1.6293

Firdes, A. P. (2024). Students’ Voices: Using ChatGPT for Learning English. ELT-Lectura: Studies and Perspectives in English Language Teaching, 12(2), 125–138. https://doi.org//10.31849/9yvvmy21

Gonsalves, C. (2025). Contextual Assessment Design in the Age of Generative AI. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 34, 14. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi34.1307

Gunawan, F. C., & Susanto, A. I. F. (2025). Investigating the Impacts of ChatGPT on Students Motivation in Learning English Grammar. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JETLE), 6(2), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.18860/jetle.v6i2.32397

Hapsari, E. W., & Sudarman, S. (2025). AI-Powered Learning: Shaping the Future of Academic Writing in EFL Education in Indonesia. JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education, 6(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.32505/jades.v6i1.10484

Hidayat, H., Yuliasr, I., Rukmini, D., & Widhiyanto. (2025). A Quasi-experimental Study of Inquiry Learning in Hybrid Environments: Impact on writing and self-regulated learning levels. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials, 7(October), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v7i2.97081

Imran, M., Almusharraf, N., Sayed, M., Milana, A., & Abbasova, Y. (2024). Interactive Mobile Technologies Enhancing Learning Systems and Transforming Educational Paradigms. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(18), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i18.49143

Khuder, B., & Negretti, R. (2025). Collaborative Writing Regulation: a comparative case study of co-regulation and socially shared regulation in higher education. Higher Education, 91(2), 677–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01437-9

Lumintang, S. F., & Kuswandono, P. (2025). Indonesian EFL Lecturers’ Positive Perceptions and Adaptive Strategies in Implementing Authentic Assessment for Sustainable Education: Mixed-methods. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovation and Materials, 7(2), 38–59. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v7i2.96334

Pariyanto, & Tungka, N. F. (2025). ChatGPT as a Formative Feedback Tool: Improving Narrative Essay Writing among EFL Students. EDULITICS JOURNAL, 10(1), 71–84. https://e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/edulitic/article/view/8657

Rafida, T., Suwandi, S., & Ananda, R. (2024). EFL Students’ Perception in Indonesia and Taiwan on Using Artificial Intelligence To Enhance Writing Skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(3), 987–1016. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i3.1520

Rohadi, T., Imani, A., Sulaeman, D., Aminuddin, M., Geng, H., & Mohammad Ekramul Islam, K. (2025). Intentional and Developmental Learners’ Agency in Deep Learning Processes during EFL Writing: An explanatory sequential design. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (Jeltim), 7(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v7i2.97197

Septyaningrum, L., Wiyaka, W., & Prastikawati, E. F. (2024). Picture-Cued Sequence Task: How Does It Effect to Students’ English Writing Ability? International Journal of Research in Education, 4(2), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v4i2.816

Soodan, V., Rana, A., Jain, A., & Sharma, D. (2024). AI Chatbot Adoption in Academia: task fit, usefullness, and collegial ties. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 23, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.28945/5260

Sulistyanto, I., Prasongko, A., & Tannaka, Z. M. (2025). Fostering EFL Students’ Academic Literacy: Students’ Perception using Elicit AI. EDULITICS, 10(2), 2015. https://doi.org/10.52166/edulitics.v10i2.11361

Susilo, A., Firdaus, M., & Yukamana, H. (2026). AI Integration in English Language Teaching : Junior High School Teachers ’ Perceptions and Readiness in Ogan Ilir , South Sumatera. International Journal of Research in Education, 6(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v6i1.3108

Ulfah, B. (2026). From Convenience to Concern: Exploring AI Paraphasing Tools in Academic Writing Practise Across Indonesia. EDULITICS JOURNAL, 10(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.52166/edulitics.v10i2.11300

Yunita, R., Fitriana, N., & Maulana, N. I. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in English Writing: Ethical Interation and Educators’ Perspectives. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies (JEELS), 12(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v12i2.5250

Downloads

Published

2026-07-16