Profile of Students’ Misconception Levels on Newton’s Laws Using a Six-Tier Diagnostic Test
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v17i2.3419Keywords:
misconceptions, Newton’s laws, six-tier diagnostic test, conceptual understanding, physics educationAbstract
Conceptual understanding is a fundamental foundation in physics learning; however, numerous studies have reported that students continue to hold misconceptions that are resistant to formal instruction. One topic that is particularly prone to misconceptions is Newton’s Laws, which serve as a basis for understanding more advanced physics concepts. This study aims to profile students’ levels of misconceptions on Newton’s Laws based on diagnostic results obtained using a six-tier diagnostic test. This research employed a quantitative descriptive approach with a survey design. The participants were 132 eleventh-grade students from SMAN 2 Cikampek, selected through purposive sampling. The instrument used was a six-tier diagnostic test covering three sub-concepts of Newton’s Laws and analyzed based on combinations of students’ answers, conceptual reasoning, confidence levels, and sources of reasoning. The results indicate that although the sound understanding category showed the highest percentage (43.99%), more than half of the students were still classified as having problematic understanding, particularly misconceptions and negative errors. Misconceptions were consistently identified across all three sub-concepts of Newton’s Laws with a cumulative pattern, where the highest level of misconception occurred in Newton’s Third Law, especially in understanding action–reaction force pairs. From the perspective of misconception sources, students’ misconceptions were predominantly derived from internal cognitive constructions based on intuition and everyday experiences. These findings emphasize that instruction on Newton’s Laws should focus on eliciting and reconstructing students’ prior conceptual understanding in an integrated manner, so that persistent misconceptions can be reduced and students’ conceptual understanding can be improved.
References
[1] Rahmina A, Wahyuni A, Zainuddin, Hamid A and Musdar 2024 The Improvement of Students’ Conceptual Understanding Using the Experimental Learning Method Asian Journal of Science Education 6 32–41
[2] Suhartin Y, Prastowo S H B and Prihandono T 2017 Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Spektrum Cahaya pada Siswa SMA Kelas XII Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika 2017 vol 2 pp 1–6
[3] Kotsis K T 2026 Persistent Misconceptions in Physics Education Across Educational Levels : Patterns , Instructional Responses , and Future Directions European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning 4 185–97
[4] Adimayuda R, Suhandi A, Samsudin A, Suhendi E, Setiawan A, Fratiwi N J and Kapici H O 2026 A Review of College Student in Physics Education : Type , Cause and Remediation Misconception Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research 7 143–52
[5] Izza R I, Nurhamidah N and Elvinawati E 2021 Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Esai Berbantuan Cri (Certainty of Response Index) Pada Pokok Bahasan Asam Basa Alotrop 5 55–63
[6] Malikha Z and Amir M F 2018 Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas V-B Min Buduran Sidoarjo Pada Materi Pecahan Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Matematika Pi: Mathematics Education Journal 1 75–81
[7] Wulandari S, Gusmalini A and Zulfarina Z 2021 Analisis Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Genetika Menggunakan Instrumen Four Tier Diagnostic Test Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia 9 642–54
[8] Sudiatmika A A I A R and Subagia I wayan 2022 Profil Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Prodi S2 Pendidikan IPA pada Materi Optik menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Four Tier Test Wahana Matematika dan Sains: Jurnal Matematika, Sains, dan Pembelajarannya 16 45–52
[9] Murdani E 2020 Hakikat Fisika dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 3 72–80
[10] Alatas F, Ilhamiah S and Suryadi A 2021 Identification of Students’ Misconceptions Using Isomorphic Test: the Case of Newton’S Law of Motion Edusains 13 174–84
[11] Betari A, Hasanati A, Fuadah F, Amir M T and Parno P 2021 Students’ Learning Motivation through the Quality of Scientific Argumentation Skills and Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes on Newton’s Laws: A Relationship Analysis Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni 10 71–84
[12] Parra Zeltzer V, Huincahue Arcos J and Abril Milan D 2024 What does Newton’s second law say? A comparison between Principia and university and school physics texts in Chile Proceedings of World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, WMSCI 256–62
[13] Mutia S, Muliani, Ayunda D S, Ginting F W and Absa M 2025 Penerapan Model Guided Discovery Learning (GDL) Untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Hukum Newton RELATIVITAS: Jurnal Riset Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika 8 1–7
[14] Rizkita N I and Mufit F 2022 Analisis Pemahaman Konsep dan Sikap Siswa Terhadap Belajar Fisika Pada Materi Hukum Newton Tentang Gerak Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP) 6 233–42
[15] Polverini G and Gregorcic B 2024 How understanding large language models can inform the use of ChatGPT in physics education European Journal of Physics 45 1–35
[16] Rosenblatt R and Heckler A F 2011 Systematic study of student understanding of the relationships between the directions of force, velocity, and acceleration in one dimension Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 7 1–20
[17] Atsilah M B, Suhadi S, Putri J K, Mabruroh F, Sugiarti S and Pebralia J 2024 Pengembangan Three Tier Test Multiple Choice Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Pada Materi Hukum Newton Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika 15 213–21
[18] Sari A L R, Parno and Taufiq A 2018 Pemahaman Konsep dan Kesulitan Siswa SMA pada Materi Hukum Newton Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan 3 1323–30
[19] Setyabudi L D and Rosdiana L 2020 Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Hukum Newton Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI) pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Pensa E-Jurnal: Pendidikan Sains 8 340–5
[20] Silaban B, Surbakti M B, Silaban I J A and Purba J 2024 Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik SMA Melalui Tes Diagnostik Four-Tier pada Hukum Newton Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika 12 260–74
[21] Sitepu E B and Yakob M 2019 Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Hukum Newton di Kelas X IPA SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi GRAVITASI Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Sains 2 23–9
[22] Azzahidah M ’Abidah, Kusairi S, Hanatan A and Hariyanto H 2024 Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMA Pada Materi Hukum Newton Menggunakan Instrumen Force Concept Inventory (FCI) Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika 15 7–17
[23] Smith T I and Wittmann M C 2007 Comparing three methods for teaching Newton’s third law Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 3 1–8
[24] Utami I, Mulyani B and Yamtinah S 2020 Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Asam-Basa dengan Two Tier Multiple Choice dilengkapi Interview Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia 9 89–97
[25] Dhona L R 2024 Lawdy Rahma Dhona_201101080015 (UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember)
[26] Zulfa F N, Ngazizah N and Pangestika R R 2025 Analisis Miskonsepsi IPA Materi Fotosintesis Ditinjau dari Perspektif Siswa Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan 8 211–26
[27] Mustofa, Zain, Tsania, Azman, Marmoah and Masfuah 2024 Analysis Of Students’ Conceptions Based On Cognitive Style On Newton’s Law Understanding Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 13 301–12
[28] Suban M E, Hidayatullah Z and Nurhasanah 2024 Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Three-Tier Diagnostic Test dan Representasi Gambar pada Konsep Gaya Hamzanwadi Journal of Science Education 1 1–9
[29] Mukminin A, Mukhlisa N and Muslimin 2025 Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Pada Materi Sains Sekolah Dasar di Kota Parepare DIKDAS MATAPPA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar 8 218–25
[30] Wahyudi, Syahrial A and Zuhdi M 2025 Menyingkap Miskonsepsi Gaya dan Gerak : Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Universitas Mataram dan Rekomendasi Perbaikan Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, dan Geofisika 6 2433–8
[31] Ablanque J, Revuelta F, Losada J C and Benito R M 2024 Persistence of Conceptual Errors in First-Year University Physics Course and Its Possible Relationship with Learning Styles Education Sciences 14 1–23
[32] Sinaga H, Yakob M and Nafaida R 2019 Remediasi Miskonsepsi Konsep Hukum Newton dengan Menggunakan Metode Eksperimen di Kelas X SMA Negeri 3 Langsa GRAVITASI Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Sains 2 30–3
[33] Taqwa M R A, Shodiqin M I and Zainuddin A 2020 Kesulitan Mahasiswa Dalam Memahami Konsep Gaya Dan Gerak LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA 10 25–39
[34] Wicaksiwi A K and Mayangsari F D 2022 Pengembangan Prototipe Media Pembelajaran pada Alat Peraga “Mobil Bertenaga Angin” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains (JPPMS) 6 25–31
[35] Mustari M, Anggereni S, Sodikin, Fitria and Yusandika A D 2020 Identification of students’ misconceptions using the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) from work and energy material Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1–10
[36] Purwaningtias W S and Putra N M D 2020 Analisis Tingkat Pemahaman Konsep dan Miskonsepsi Fisika pada Pokok Bahasan Alat-alat Optik di SMA Negeri 1 Purwodadi Unnes Physics Education Journal (UPEJ) 9 139–48
[37] Mushthofa Z, Rusilowati A, Marwoto P and Mindyarto B N 2020 Misconception Profile of Newton’s Law Concept Using Certainty of Response Index (CRI) Physics Communication 4 5–12
[38] Budiman J Y, Samsudin A and Aminudin A 2025 Investigating students ’ conceptual change in learning newton ’ s laws through a project-based learning design informed by understanding by design Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education 5 541–53
[39] Soeharto, Csapó B, Sarimanah E, Dewi F I and Sabri T 2019 Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia A Review Of Students’ Common Misconceptions In Science And Their Diagnostic Assessment Tools Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia 8 247–66
[40] Putri O W, Yani A and Fitriawan D 2025 Eksplorasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditori, Kinestetik (Vak) Pada Materi Bangun Datar Segiempat Journal Of Educational Review And Research (JERR) 8 42–9
