Analysis of Students' Questioning Skills During Discovery Learning: A Descriptive Study Based on The Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v15i4.874Keywords:
keterampilan bertanya, discovery learning, taksonomi bloom revisiAbstract
The problem in this study is the lack of questioning skills based on cognitive process dimensions and knowledge dimensions. This research aims to analyze questioning skills through students' written work using the revised Bloom's Taxonomy framework, specifically the cognitive process and knowledge dimensions. The participants were 32 students (15 males and 17 females) from class XI MIPA 3 at a high school in Bandung. This descriptive study employed documentation analysis using Google Forms for individual questions and worksheets for group questions. The results depict students' cognitive processes at the levels of remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating as 18.25%, 47.44%, 9.49%, 18.25%, 2.92%, and 3.65%, respectively. In terms of knowledge dimensions, the percentages for factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge were 24.82%, 72.99%, 2.19%, and 0%, respectively. It can be concluded that questioning based on cognitive processes is distributed across all levels from remembering to creating, while questions based on knowledge dimensions are predominantly conceptual.
References
Sudjana N 2010 Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar (Bandung: Sinar Baru)
Alma B, Mulyadi H, Razati G and Lena Nuryati B 2010 Guru Profesional (Menguasai Metode Dan Terampil Mengajar) (Bandung: Alfabeta)
Trianto 2007 Inovasi Pembelajaran (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta)
Huda MS 2017 Pengaruh Konseling Kelompok terhadap Keaktifan Siswa dalam Mengikuti Kegiatan Pembelajaran Siswa Kelas VIII MTsn Tanjung Tani Prambon (Nganjuk)
Suwarna 2006 Pengajaran Mikro (Pendekatan Praktis Menyiapkan Pendidik Professional). (Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana Yogya)
Udin Syaefudin S 2013 Pengembangan profesi guru (Bandung: Alfabeta)
Mufarokah A 2009 Strategi belajar mengajar (Yogyakarta: Teras)
Nuraini F, Tri Jalmo and Yolida B 2017 Profil Keterampilan Bertanya Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Biologi SMA Negeri 2 Bandar Lampung Fitri J Chem Inf Model 53
Putri N I, Fadillah M R, Putri A L, Nurhasanah A and Hidayat A R 2024 Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas XII IPA 3 di SMAN 7 Kota Serang Pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Demokrasi Liberal JEJAK: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah & Sejarah 4 60–73
Rahmawati D and Lutfi L 2024 Analisis Penerapan Metode Ceramah dalam Memotivasi Belajar Siswa terhadap Pemahaman Materi Peran Ekonomi dalam Menyejahterakan Masyarakat di Mata Pelajaran IPS Kelas V SD Dharma Karya UT SEMNASFIP
Harza M H and Nasution M 2024 Analisis Penggunaan Metode Ceramah dan Tanya Jawab pada Materi Rububiyyah di Pondok Pesantren MIs Al Azhar Lil Mukhtarin Medan EduInovasi: Journal of Basic Educational Studies 4 1936–45
Ruseffendi E T 1991 Pendidikan Matematika 3 (Depdikbud)
Kurniasih I 2014 Strategi-Strategi Pembelajaran (Alfabet)
ARMEYLIA WIDYANTI A Penerapan Model Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Bertanya Siswa Kelas Vii Pada Mata Pelajaran Ski Di Mtsn 1 Sidoarjo
Sofwan M 2016 Meningkatkan Kemampuan Bertanya Dasar Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Model Discovery Learning Di Kelas Iii B Sdn 64/1 Muara Bulian Jurnal Pendidikan Tematik Dikdas Universitas Jambi 1
Kurniasih I and Sani B 2014 Implementasikan Kurikulum 2013 Konsep dan Penerapan (Surabaya: Kata Pena)
Arikunto Suharsimi 2013 Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta)
Zamzani Z 2021 Pengembangan Alat Ukur Kesantunan Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Interaksi Sosial Bersemuka LITERA 10
Moleong L J 2018 Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (PT Remaja Rosdakarya)
Sanaky M M 2021 Analisis Faktor-Faktor Keterlambatan Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Asrama MAN 1 Tulehu Maluku Tengah JURNAL SIMETRIK 11
Aflalo E 2021 Students generating questions as a way of learning Active Learning in Higher Education 22 63–75
Poort I, Jansen E and Hofman A 2022 Does the group matter? Effects of trust, cultural diversity, and group formation on engagement in group work in higher education Higher Education Research & Development 41 511–26
