Profile Of Students' Creative Thinking Skills And Science Literacy In Science Learning At SMP N 12 Pekalongan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/jsse.v1i1.903Keywords:
Creative thinking, Scientific literacy, Science Learning, Profil of StudentAbstract
Based on the results of the PISA study in 2022, it shows that the literacy level of Indonesian students is still far from the global education average. PISA also examines students' creative thinking abilities which shows that only 5% of Indonesian students are considered proficient in creative thinking. This shows that the level of creative thinking ability of Indonesian students is at a very low score. This research aims to describe the profile of students' creative thinking skills and scientific literacy of class IX students at SMPN 12 Pekalongan in science learning for the 2023/2024 academic year. The research subjects were 25 students in class IX of SMP N 12 Pekalongan. The research method used is descriptive quantitative by collecting data using essay test questions which are explained based on indicators of creative thinking skills and scientific literacy. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis. The average research results for students' creative thinking skills were 47% so they were categorized as sufficient. Based on the indicators, fluency of 56% was categorized as sufficient, flexibility/flexibility of 44% was categorized as good, authenticity/originality of 48% was categorized as sufficient and detail/elaboration of 52% was categorized as sufficient. Scientific literacy results obtained an average of 36% so it is categorized as sufficient. Based on the indicator of the scientific knowledge aspect, the result was 52% in the sufficient category, the result for the understanding of science aspect was 52% in the sufficient category and the result for the attitude towards science aspect was 56% in the good category. The results of creative thinking skills and scientific literacy at SMP N 12 Pekalongan are still in the sufficient category, so it is necessary for teachers to analyze the profile of students' creative thinking skills and scientific literacy in science learning in order to improve their creative thinking skills and scientific literacy to be better or very good.
References
Amtiningsih, S., Dwiastuti, S., & Sari, D. P. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif melalui Penerapan Guided Inquiry dipadu Brainstorming pada Materi Pencemaran Air.
Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 13(1), 868–872.
Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta.
Budiman, A. (2021). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP Negeri se-Kecamatan Cigudeg Kabupaten Bogor pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha)
Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri,
A. W. (2020). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2),108–116. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122
Hidayah, N., Rusilowati, A., & Masturi, M. (2019). Analisis profil kemampuan literasi sains siswa SMP/MTs di Kabupaten Pati. Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 9(1), 36-47.Hurlock, E. (1990). Perkembangan Anak. Jakarta:Erlangga.
Khamida, A. N., Edy Bambang Irawan, & Hery Susanto. (2017). Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Impulsif. Prosiding SI MaNIs (Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika dan Nilai Islami), 591-596.
Kurniawan, T., & Enok Maryani. (2015). Pengaruh Lingkungan Keluarga dan Lingkungan Sekolah terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran IPS. JPIS, Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 209-216.
Mijaya, N.P.A.P., A.A.I.A.R. Sudiatmika, and K. Selamet, Profil Literasi Sains SMP Melalui Model Pembelajaran Levels of Inquiry. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia.
