Performance Evaluation of a Community-Scale Fiberglass Anaerobic Digester for Biogas and Nutrient Recovery

Authors

  • Rahmat Sabani Universitas Sebelas Maret Indonesia
  • Ari Handono Ramelan Universitas Sebelas Maret Indonesia
  • Pranoto Universitas Sebelas Maret Indonesia
  • Mohammad Masykuri Universitas Sebelas Maret Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i3.2422

Keywords:

Anaerobic digestion, fiberglass biodigester, methane yield, organic waste treatment, renewable energy recovery

Abstract

The management of organic waste using an anaerobic reactor offers the potential for renewable energy production and nutrient recovery. This study evaluates the performance of a 3,000 L fiberglass anaerobic reactor designed to treat a mixture of kitchen waste, cow manure, and water in a 1:1:1 ratio. The process was conducted under mesophilic conditions (30–38 °C) over a 40-day batch cycle. The reactor produced a total of 63.75 m³ of biogas with an average methane content of 59.3%, equivalent to 0.193 m³ CH₄/kg VS. Additionally, the system produces approximately 2,700 kg/month of liquid effluent and 900 kg/month of stabilized solids. These results demonstrate the efficiency of substrate bioconversion and the potential for utilizing residues as organic fertilizer. This study emphasizes the technical feasibility of using a community-scale fiberglass reactor for organic waste treatment with measurable performance parameters.

Author Biographies

  • Rahmat Sabani, Universitas Sebelas Maret

    Doctoral Program of Environmental Science, Postgraduate School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Kentingan Jl. Ir. Sutami No.36, Jebres, Surakarta, Indonesia

  • Ari Handono Ramelan, Universitas Sebelas Maret

    Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Kentingan Jl. Ir. Sutami No.36, Jebres, Surakarta, Indonesia

  • Pranoto, Universitas Sebelas Maret

    Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Kentingan Jl. Ir. Sutami No.36, Jebres, Surakarta, Indonesia

  • Mohammad Masykuri, Universitas Sebelas Maret

    Department Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Kentingan Jl. Ir. Sutami No.36, Jebres, Surakarta, Indonesia

References

[1] Pandyaswargo AH, Jagath Dickella Gamaralalage P, Liu C, Knaus M, Onoda H, Mahichi F, et al. Challenges and an Implementation Framework for Sustainable Municipal Organic Waste Management Using Biogas Technology in Emerging Asian Countries. Sustainability 2019;11:6331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226331

[2] Ayilara MS, Olanrewaju OS, Babalola OO, Odeyemi O. Waste Management through Composting: Challenges and Potentials. Sustainability 2020;12:4456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114456

[3] Mashi SA, Inkani AI, Jenkwe ED, Idris K. Determinants of urban waste recycling among smallholder farmers in Katsina, Nigeria: Awareness, adoption, and valorization. Cleaner Waste Systems 2025;12:100354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100354

[4] FAO. Global food losses and food waste: Extent, causes and prevention. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2021. https://www.fao.org.

[5] UNEP. Global Waste Management Outlook 2. United Nations Environment Programme2 2022. https://www.unep.org.

[6] IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2021. https://www.ipcc.ch.

[7] Roa ID, Henriquez JR, Dutra ED, Menezes RSC, Andrade MMM, Santos Junior EP, et al. Economic Feasibility of Biogas Microgeneration from Food Waste: Potential for Sustainable Energy in Northeastern Brazil. Sustainability 2024;16:10238. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310238

[8] Gronwald F, Wang L. Advancing Renewable Energy : The Prospects of Hydrothermal Liquefaction ( HTL ) for Biomass into Bio-oil Conversion. International Journal of Environment, Engineering & Education 2024;6:132–44.

[9] Wang S, Xu C, Song L, Zhang J. Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Its Microbial Consortia: A Historical Review and Future Perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19:9519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159519

[10] Mariappan I, Prabhakaran R, Vivekanand V, Poomani MS, Muthan K, Dhandayuthapani S, et al. Exploring Cutting-Edge Approaches in Anaerobic Digestion and Anaerobic Digestate Management. ChemBioEng Reviews 2024;11:573–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.202300063

[11] Yadav D, Kumar S, Mahapatra DM. Application of digestate from anaerobic digesters for agricultural nutrient recovery: A review. Waste Management 2021;121:105–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.12.009

[12] Dutta S, He M, Xiong X, Tsang DCW. Sustainable management and recycling of food waste anaerobic digestate: A review. Bioresource Technology 2021;341:125915. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125915

[13] Khanal SK, Lü F, Wong JWC, Wu D, Oechsner H. Anaerobic digestion beyond biogas. Bioresource Technology 2021;337:125378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125378

[14] Sevillano CA, Pesantes AA, Peña Carpio E, Martínez EJ, Gómez X. Anaerobic Digestion for Producing Renewable Energy—The Evolution of This Technology in a New Uncertain Scenario. Entropy 2021;23:145. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23020145

[15] González R, Peña DC, Gómez X. Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Wastes: Reviewing Current Status and Approaches for Enhancing Biogas Production. Applied Sciences 2022;12:8884. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178884

[16] Srivastava A, Meena PK, Patane PM, Meena D, Shelare S, Wagle CS. Advancements in Biogas Digester Materials: A Review of Strength, Durability, and Suitability. Water Environment Research 2025;97:e70119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70119

[17] Pal S, Bello A, Muratova E, Chekanov A. A review of the materials utilized in the design and fabrication of biogas digesters. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2025;211:115167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115167

[18] Wijaya K, Sitompul H, Sebayang N, Sari RA, Idris I, Medan UN, et al. DEVELOPMENT OF RAMMED EARTH MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY BY UTILIZING PLASTIC WASTE AS REINFORCEMENT ON THE PARTITION WALLS OF THE BUILDING ROOM. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS) 2025;6: 1412–28.

[19] Zhao Z, Wang X, Zheng G. Low-cost digester materials for small-scale biogas production: A comparative research. Renewable Energy 2020; 145:739–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.087

[20] Aboud AA, El-Mashad HM, Zhang R. Effect of co-digestion ratios on biogas production and digester performance. Renewable Energy 2022;187:980–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.051

[21] Qiao W, Takayanagi K, Shimizu Y. Co-digestion of food waste and manure: Process synergy and operational optimization. Waste Management 2022;144:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.007

[22] Martín-Sanz-Garrido C, Revuelta-Aramburu M, Santos-Montes AM, Morales-Polo C. A Review on Anaerobic Digestate as a Biofertilizer: Characteristics, Production, and Environmental Impacts from a Life Cycle Assessment Perspective. Applied Sciences 2025;15:8635. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158635

[23] Paranjpe A, Saxena S, Jain P. Biogas yield using single and two stage anaerobic digestion: An experimental approach. Energy for Sustainable Development 2023;74:6–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2023.03.005

[24] Agrawal A, Chaudhari PK, Ghosh P. Anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable waste: a critical review of associated challenges. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2023;30:24987–5012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21643-7

[25] Nielsen K, Roß C-L, Hoffmann M, Muskolus A, Ellmer F, Kautz T. The Chemical Composition of Biogas Digestates Determines Their Effect on Soil Microbial Activity. Agriculture 2020;10:244. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060244

[26] Bouallagui H, Touhami Y, Cheikh R Ben, Hamdi M. Biogas production from fruit and vegetable waste using anaerobic digestion: State of the art review. Bioresource Technology Reports 2020;12:100567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100567

[27] Panuccio MR, Mallamaci C, Attinà E, Muscolo A. Using Digestate as Fertilizer for a Sustainable Tomato Cultivation. Sustainability 2021;13:1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031574

[28] Piccoli I, Grillo F, Longo M, Furlanetto I, Ragazzi F, Obber S, et al. A farm-scale sustainability assessment of the anaerobic digestate application methods. European Journal of Agronomy 2023;146:126811. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126811

[29] Tavera CG, Raab T, Holguin Trujillo L. Valorization of biogas digestate as organic fertilizer for closing the loop on the economic viability to develop biogas projects in Colombia. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy 2023;4:100035. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2022.100035

[30] Akbar A, Sihabudin MY, Firdaus RE, Pahreji R. Perkembangan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Advances In Social Humanities Research 2023;1:627–35.

[31] Zhang J, Chen Y, Li Y. Performance evaluation of modular fiberglass digesters under tropical conditions. Bioresource Technology Reports 2023;21:101243.

[32] Kumar A, Gupta H, Sharma R. Techno-economic assessment of small-scale anaerobic digesters in rural India. Renewable Energy Focus 2022;41:135–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2021.12.008.

[33] Jha MK, Sreekrishnan TR, Kumar S. Financial assessment of decentralized biogas systems: Case studies and policy recommendations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2020;133:110266

[34] Suminah S, Anantanyu S, Suwarto S, Sugihardjo S, Padmaningrum D. The influence of empowerment towards agricultural business actors’ ability in Surakarta, Indonesia. Social Sciences 2023;12:76. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12020076

[35] Singh RP, Ibrahim MH, Esa N, Ilangovan K. Reduction of environmental pollution through community biogas plants: A research from Southeast Asia. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2022;28:102678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102678

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

Issue

Section

Articles