Design and Evaluation of Hazard Analysis Procedures in Mining Occupational Safety Programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i3.2490Keywords:
Hazard Analysis Procedure, Occupational Safety and Health, Fuzzy Delphi, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), Parameter K3Abstract
Workplace accidents in the mining industry remain high, highlighting the need for systematic hazard analysis to strengthen Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) programs. This study aims to design and evaluate a Hazard Analysis Procedure (HAP) model for PT. XYZ. Using quantitative methods, the research applied the Fuzzy Delphi technique to validate OHS parameters and the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to determine their relative weights. Data were obtained from ten certified OHS experts through structured questionnaires. Twenty-four indicators were identified, grouped into six main criteria: management leadership, worker participation, hazard identification and assessment, hazard prevention and control, program evaluation and improvement, and accident frequency. FAHP results showed that management commitment (0.092), hazard identification (0.088), and program evaluation (0.081) were the most influential indicators. A 95% threshold was proposed as the benchmark for successful HAP implementation. Findings provide practical recommendations and support continuous improvement of mining OHS management systems.
References
[1] Hao M, Nie Y. Hazard identification, risk assessment and management of industrial system: Process safety in mining industry. Saf Sci 2022;154:105863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105863
[2] Rudakov M, Gridina E, Kretschmann J. Risk-based thinking as a basis for efficient occupational safety management in the mining industry. Sustainability 2021;13:470. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020470
[3] Na XU, Ling MA, Li W. An improved text mining approach to extract safety risk factors from construction accident reports. Saf Sci 2021;138:105216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105216
[4] Dodoo JE, Al-Samarraie H. A systematic review of factors leading to occupational injuries and fatalities. J Public Health (Bangkok) 2023;31:99–113.
[5] Debela MB, Azage M, Begosaw AM, Kabeta ND. Factors contributing to occupational injuries among workers in the construction, manufacturing, and mining industries in Africa. J Public Health Policy 2022;43:487–502.
[6] Samarasinghe H, Heenatigala S. Insights from the field: A comprehensive analysis of industrial accidents in plants and strategies for enhanced workplace safety. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:240305539 2024. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojsst.2024.141001
[7] Cruz-Ausejo L, Cama-Ttito NA, Solano PF, Copez-Lonzoy A, Vera-Ponce VJ. Occupational accidents in mining workers: scoping review of studies published in the last 13 years. BMJ Open 2024;14:e080572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080572
[8] ILO. EU-ILO Partnership: Safe and Healthy Workplaces for All. Https://WwwIloOrg/Publications/Eu-Ilo-Partnership-Safe-and-Healthy-Workplaces-All 2025.
[9] Iqbal M, Kamaludin A. Analisis faktor penyebab kecelakaan kerja pada pekerja pertambangan. Jurnal Keselamatan, Kesehatan Kerja Dan Lingkungan (JK3L) 2021;2.
[10] Rahmadani GF, Dwi Putri H, Irwansyah MI. Penerapan Kesehatan Dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Pada Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara. Research Gate, March 2021:1–3.
[11] Saputra FT, Arisanti R, Yansen D. Analisis Penerapan Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Pertambangan di PT Lematang Coal Lestari Gunung Raja Sumatera Selatan. Unpra Engineering Journal 2024;1:10–4.
[12] Agarwalla S, Singh SK, Ibrahim MA, Duraiswamy S. Safety Management: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment at the Workplace. Chemical Engineering Essentials 2: Advanced Processes, Materials, and Sustainability 2025:247–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394372379.ch11
[13] Baghaei Naeini SA, Badri A. Identification and categorization of hazards in the mining industry: A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering 2024;15:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1556/1848.2023.00621
[14] Spanidis P-M, Roumpos C, Pavloudakis F. A fuzzy-AHP methodology for Planning the risk management of Natural hazards in surface mining projects. Sustainability 2021;13:2369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042369
[15] Punithan PE, Ramakrishnan R, Nallavan G, Jayanarasimhan K. Engineering Design and Prototyping of an Automated Shuttlecock Feeder with Programmable Court-Zone Targeting. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education n.d.;8:51–64. 10.55151/ijeedu.v8i1.335
[16] Andriani A, Istijono B, Alfito A, Akmal F, Adji BM. Identification of landslide hazard in residential area Kubang Tangah District, Sawahlunto. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS) 2024;5:1154–64. https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v5i2.3893
[17] Unver S, Ergenc I. Safety risk identification and prioritize of forest logging activities using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Alexandria Engineering Journal 2021;60:1591–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.11.012
[18] Nguyen TA Van, Tucek D, Pham NT. Indicators for TQM 4.0 model: Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 2023;34:220–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2039062
[19] Purnama Sari AAMW, Ekawati AD. Developing a Product Quality Management Evaluation Model for a Sustainable Cement Industry in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1488, IOP Publishing; 2025, p. 012012. 10.1088/1755-1315/1488/1/012012
[20] Sherin S, Raza S, Ahmad I. Conceptual framework for hazards management in the surface mining industry—application of structural equation modeling. Safety 2023;9:31. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9020031
[21] Usman Mohammed, Shahmir Sivaraj Abdullah, Shuhymee Ahmad. Narratives of total quality management, green management, risk-taking on organizational performance: The moderating role of IT infrastructure. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 2024;6. https://10.31893/multiscience.2024230
[22] Zhao Y, Qiu R, Chen M, Xiao S. Research on operational safety risk assessment method for long and large highway tunnels based on FAHP and SPA. Applied Sciences 2023;13:9151. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169151
[23] Mahdinia M, Yarandi MS, Jafarinia E, Soltanzadeh A. Development of a new technique for safety risk assessment in construction projects based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. ASCE ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst A Civ Eng 2021;7:04021037. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001157
[24] Moloudi A, Khaloo SS, Gholamnia R, Saeedi R. Prioritizing health, safety and environmental hazards by integrating risk assessment and analytic hierarchy process techniques in solid waste management facilities. Arch Environ Occup Health 2022;77:598–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2021.1977907
[25] Mousavi SM, Yazdanirad S, Althubiti S, Majdabadi MA, Najarian F, Sepehr P. Determination and prioritization of factors affecting the occurrence of needle stick injuries among healthcare workers using techniques of Delphi and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). BMC Public Health 2023;23:2009.
[26] Alqahtani FM, Noman MA. An integrated fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy AHP model for evaluating factors affecting human errors in manual assembly processes. Systems 2024;12:479. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110479
[27] Ketsakorn A, Kosolsaksakul P. Application of Delphi technique and analytic hierarchy process to prioritize the occupational health and safety management system requirements. Int J Occup Saf Health 2025;15:182–91. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijosh.v15i2.60760
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Advance Sustainable Science Engineering and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
