Effect of NaOH Molarity on Gel Formation at the Geopolymer–Artificial Aggregate Interface for Pavement Applications

Authors

  • Yayan Adi Saputro slamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara Indonesia
  • Adnan Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology Pakistan
  • Gunawan Mohammad Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara Indonesia
  • Nor Hidayati Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara Indonesia
  • Nando Nilna Muna Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara Indonesia
  • Aprilia Citra Ningrum Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i1.3058

Keywords:

geopolymer, interfacial transition zone, alkali activator concentration, hybrid gel formation, artificial aggregate, pavement binder

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of NaOH molarity (10, 12, and 14 M) on gel formation at the geopolymer–artificial aggregate interfacial transition zone (ITZ) for sustainable pavement binder courses. The study focuses on microstructural and chemical characteristics rather than direct mechanical performance. Using XRF, FTIR, and SEM–EDX analyses, the evolution of gel phases from N-A-S-H to hybrid N/C-A-S-H at the interface was systematically characterized. Increasing NaOH molarity enhanced aluminosilicate dissolution and promoted Ca incorporation, as evidenced by the shift of the main Si–O–T band from approximately 1080 cm⁻¹ (10 M) to 960–970 cm⁻¹ (14 M) and the increase in Ca/Si ratio from 0.15 to 0.22. Among the investigated mixtures, the 12 M variant exhibited the most homogeneous and compact ITZ microstructure, characterized by a continuous reaction rim, balanced Si/Al (2.96) and Ca/Si (0.22) ratios, and minimal microcracking observed at the microscopic scale.

Author Biographies

  • Yayan Adi Saputro, slamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara

    Civil Engineering Program Study, Faculty of Science and Technology, Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara, Jepara, Indonesia

  • Adnan, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology

    Sarhad University of Sains and Information Technology, Peshawar, 25000, Pakistan

  • Gunawan Mohammad, Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara

    Industrial Engineering Program Study, Faculty of Science and Technology, Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara, Jepara, Indonesia

  • Nor Hidayati, Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara

    Civil Engineering Program Study, Faculty of Science and Technology, Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara, Jepara, Indonesia

  • Nando Nilna Muna, Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara

    Civil Engineering Program Study, Faculty of Science and Technology, Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara, Jepara, Indonesia

  • Aprilia Citra Ningrum, Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara

    Civil Engineering Program Study, Faculty of Science and Technology, Islamic University of Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara, Jepara, Indonesia

References

[1] Davidovits J. Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications. vol. 171. 2008.

[2] Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis J, Lukey G, Palomo A, Van Deventer J. Geopolymer Technology: The Current State of the Art. J Mater Sci 2007;42:2917–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z.

[3] San Nicolas R, Provis J. The Interfacial Transition Zone in Alkali-Activated Slag Mortars. Front Mater 2015;2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2015.00070.

[4] Nath P, Sarker PK. Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Constr Build Mater 2014;66:163–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080.

[5] Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A. Composition and Microstructure of Alkali Activated Fly Ash Binder. Cement and Concrete Research 2005;35:1984–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.003.

[6] Lee NK, Lee HK. Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag concrete manufactured at room temperature. Construction and Building Materials 2013;47:1201–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.107.

[7] Matsuda A, Maruyama I, Meawad A, Araki Y. Reaction, Phases, and Microstructure of Fly Ash-Based Alkali-Activated Materials. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology 2019;17:93–101. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.17.93.

[8] Thomas M. Supplementary Cementing Materials in Concrete. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14493.

[9] Guo X, Shi H, Dick W. Compressive strength and microstructural characteristics of class C fly ash geopolymer. Cement and Concrete Composites 2010;32:142–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.003.

[10] Sharmin S. The microstructural characterization of alkali- activated binders incorporating waste clay brick powder with fly ash and GGBFS 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2025.2586659.

[11] Singh B, Ishwarya G, Gupta M, Bhattacharyya SK. Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Construction and Building Materials 2015;85:78–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036.

[12] Peng H, Cui C, Cai CS, Liu Y, Liu Z. Microstructure and microhardness property of the interface between a metakaolin/GGBFS-based geopolymer paste and granite aggregate. Construction and Building Materials 2019;221:263–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.090.

[13] Techniques I. Geopolymer-Based Artificial Aggregates : A Review on Methods 2022.

[14] Kai M, Dai J-G. Understanding geopolymer binder-aggregate interfacial characteristics at molecular level. Cement and Concrete Research 2021;149:106582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106582.

[15] Komnitsas K, Soultana A, Bartzas G. Marble Waste Valorization through Alkali Activation 2021.

[16] Yip CK, Lukey GC, van Deventer JSJ. The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation. Cem Concr Res 2005;35:1688–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.042.

[17] Ahmad Sofri L, Abdullah MMAB, Mohd Hasan MR, Huang Y. The Influence of Sodium Hydroxide Concentration on Physical Properties and Strength Development of High Calcium Fly Ash Based Geopolymer as Pavement Base Materials. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2020;864:12016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/864/1/012016.

[18] Mishra A, Choudhary D, Jain N, Kumar M, Sharda N, Dutt D. Effect of concentration of alkali liquid and curing time on strength and water absorption of geopolymer concrete. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science 2008;3.

[19] Nath S, Maitra S, Mukherjee S, Kumar S. Microstructural evolution of fly ash geopolymer: effect of alkali concentration. 2015.

[20] Khale D, Chaudhary R. Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: A review. Journal of Materials Science 2007;42:729–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0401-4.

[21] Fu Q, Bu M, Zhang Z, Xu W, Yuan Q, Niu D. Hydration Characteristics and Microstructure of Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete: A Review. Engineering 2023;20:162–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.07.026.

[22] Asif A, Man Z, Khairun Azizi A, Nuruddin M, Ismail L. The Effect of Si/Al Ratio and Sodium Silicate on the Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer for Coating. Materials Science Forum 2014;803:355–61. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.803.355.

[23] Saputro YA, Widagdo J, Arifin S, Assa’idi S, Miftahunnajah NAP, Bon AT. Setting time and compressive strength of geopolymer concrete with variations in the addition of cement. AIP Conference Proceedings 2024.

[24] Saputro YA, Mudiyono R, Antonius. The analysis of mortar concrete with the variety of sands in jepara (keling sand, bangsri sand) using strong pressure method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2019;1363. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1363/1/012089.

[25] Wong CL, Yap SP, Alengaram UJ, Yuen CW, Yeo JS, Mo KH. Properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer incorporating recycled brick waste and borax. Hybrid Advances 2024;5:100130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2023.100130.

[26] Jitchaiyaphum K, Suksiripattanapong C. Enhancement of Properties of Fly Ash Geopolymer Paste with Low NaOH Concentrations Using a Pressing Approach 2025:186–99.

[27] Nuaklong P, Wongsa A, Sata V, Boonserm K, Sanjayan J, Chindaprasirt P. Properties of high-calcium and low-calcium fly ash combination geopolymer mortar containing recycled aggregate. Heliyon 2019;5:e02513. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02513.

[28] Wong CL, Yap SP, Alengaram UJ, Yuen CW, Yeo JS, Mo KH. Properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer incorporating recycled brick waste and borax. Hybrid Advances 2024;5:100130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2023.100130.

[29] Poojalakshmi ES, Nagarajan P, Sudhakumar J, Thomas BS. Impact of alkaline activator concentration on mechanical properties and microstructure of a ternary blended one-part geopolymer cement. Sci Rep 2025;15:33808. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01610-1.

[30] Wang J, Hu Z, Chen Y, Huang J, Ma Y, Zhu W, et al. Effect of Ca/Si and Al/Si on micromechanical properties of C(-A)-S-H. Cem Concr Res 2022;157:106811. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106811.

[31] Luo Y, Koh CH, Li SH, Brouwers HJH, Yu Q. Understanding the thermal behavior of geopolymeric composites designed by packing model. Cem Concr Compos 2023;143:105265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105265.

[32] Sajan P, Jiang T, Lau C, Tan G, Ng K. Combined effect of curing temperature, curing period and alkaline concentration on the mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer. Cleaner Materials 2021;1:100002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2021.100002.

[33] Yip CK, Lukey GC, van Deventer JSJ. The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation. Cem Concr Res 2005;35:1688–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.042.

[34] El Alouani M, Saufi H, Aouan B, Bassam R, Alehyen S, Rachdi Y, et al. A comprehensive review of synthesis, characterization, and applications of aluminosilicate materials-based geopolymers. Environmental Advances 2024;16:100524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100524.

[35] Madirisha MM, Dada OR, Ikotun BD. Chemical fundamentals of geopolymers in sustainable construction. Materials Today Sustainability 2024;27:100842. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100842.

[36] Nanda RP, Priya N. Geopolymer as stabilising materials in pavement constructions: A review. Cleaner Waste Systems 2024;7:100134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100134.

[37] Shilar FA, Ganachari S V, Patil VB, Khan TMY, Javed S, Baig RU. Optimization of Alkaline Activator on the Strength Properties of Geopolymer Concrete. Polymers (Basel) 2022;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122434.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30