Unveiling the Link Between Numeracy Skills and Self-Efficacy: A Study on Physics Learning Through AKM Assessments

Authors

  • Fathiah Alatas Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9387-2083
  • Amrizaldi Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Jannatun Latifah Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Agus Budiyono Universitas Islam Madura
  • Andi Marwanti Panre Nara Institute of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v16i4.1866

Keywords:

Numeracy Skills, Self-Efficacy, Physics, Assessment

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between numeracy skills and self-efficacy among grade 10 students within the context of the Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) in physics, focusing on linear and parabolic motion. Employing a quantitative descriptive design, the research involved 140 students from a public high school in Bekasi, Indonesia. Instruments included a numeracy test comprising 17 AKM-based physics questions and a self-efficacy questionnaire adapted from Bandura's framework, covering the dimensions of level, generality, and strength. Results indicated that most students (53%) were at the "Basic" level of numeracy performance, while 67% exhibited moderate self-efficacy. A significant positive correlation was found between self-efficacy and numeracy performance (r = 0.743), with the "Strength" dimension showing the strongest correlation (r = 0.716). These findings suggest enhancing self-efficacy, particularly the strength dimension, can improve numeracy skills and AKM readiness. The study underscores the importance of tailored interventions to strengthen self-efficacy and recommends further research into additional factors affecting numeracy performance and interdisciplinary approaches to teaching numeracy across subjects.

Author Biographies

  • Fathiah Alatas, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

    Pendidikan Fisika

  • Amrizaldi, Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Negeri Malang

    Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Negeri Malang

References

[1] H. R. Widarti, D. A. Rokhim, M. O. Septiani, and M. H. A. Dzikrulloh, “Identification of Science Teacher Practices and Barriers in Preparation of Minimum Competency Assessment in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era,” Orbital, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 63–67, 2022, doi: 10.17807/orbital.v14i1.1695.

[2] W. Siswaningsih, P. Purnawarman, T. Lestari, A. E. Febriani, and T. Rohmawati, “Development of Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) on Chemical Materials,” Moroccan J. Chem., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 452–463, 2022, doi: 10.48317/IMIST.PRSM/morjchem-v10i3.33067.

[3] H. Purnomo, C. Sa’dijah, E. Hidayanto, H. Permadi, and L. Anwar, “Development of Instrument Numeracy Skills Test of Minimum Competency Assessment (MCA) in Indonesia,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 635–648, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15335a.

[4] L. Rahmawati and D. Irianti, “Analysis of Science Literacy Ability of Science Education Study Program Students in Terms of Ability to Answer Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) Questions for Class VII Junior High School,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics Inc., 2022. doi: 10.1063/5.0114949.

[5] R. M. Faragher, “Developing numeracy to enhance quality of life,” in Social Indicators Research Series, Australian Catholic University (Canberra), P.O. Box 256, Dickson, 2602, ACT, Australia: Springer Nature, 2011, pp. 401–411. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-9650-0_21.

[6] D. Evans, “Examining the literacy within numeracy to provide access to the curriculum for all,” Int. Perspect. Incl. Educ., vol. 11, pp. 35–51, 2017, doi: 10.1108/S1479-363620170000011003.

[7] D. Tout, “Evolution of adult numeracy from quantitative literacy to numeracy: Lessons learned from international assessments,” Int. Rev. Educ., vol. 66, no. 2–3, pp. 183–209, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11159-020-09831-4.

[8] A. Sari, R. Putri, and Zulkardi, “Development of Learning Environment Using STEAM for Primary Pre-Service Teacher: A Systematic Literature Review,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, Mathematics Education, Universitas Sriwijaya, Jalan Raya Padang Selasa 524, Palembang, Indonesia: American Institute of Physics, 2024. doi: 10.1063/5.0201092.

[9] X. Feng, J. Sundman, H. Aarnio, M. Taka, M. Keskinen, and O. Varis, “Towards transformative learning: students’ disorienting dilemmas and coping strategies in interdisciplinary problem-based learning,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., 2024, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2024.2424197.

[10] C. Sa’dijah et al., “Students’ Numeracy Skills in Solving Numeracy Tasks: Analysis of Students of Junior High Schools,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, H. H. and F. N., Eds., Universitas Negeri Malang, Jalan Semarang No.5, Malang, 65145, Indonesia: American Institute of Physics Inc., 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0113664.

[11] A. Beatty, E. Berkhout, L. Bima, M. Pradhan, and D. Suryadarma, “Schooling progress, learning reversal: Indonesia’s learning profiles between 2000 and 2014,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 85, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102436.

[12] A. Fauzan, Y. Harisman, F. Tasman, S. Nisa, and H. Syaputra, “Reslistic mathematics education (RME) to improve literacy and numeracy skills of elementary school students based on teachers’ experience,” Infin. J., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 301–316, 2024, doi: 10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p301-316.

[13] Y. P. Sari and R. I. I. Putri, “Development of PISA type questions to improve student numeracy,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics, 2024. doi: 10.1063/5.0201036.

[14] D. C. Elliott, “The impact of self beliefs on post-secondary transitions: The moderating effects of institutional selectivity,” High. Educ., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 415–431, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9913-7.

[15] L. A. Fast et al., “Does Math Self-Efficacy Mediate the Effect of the Perceived Classroom Environment on Standardized Math Test Performance ?,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 729–740, 2010, doi: 10.1037/a0018863.

[16] E. M. Marshman, Z. Y. Kalender, T. Nokes-Malach, C. Schunn, and C. Singh, “Female students with A’s have similar physics self-efficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: A cause for alarm?,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 14, no. 2, 2018, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020123.

[17] R.-G. Ouyang, Y. Long, J.-Q. Zhang, and Z. Cao, “Interventions for improving self-efficacy in patients after stroke based on self-efficacy-related principles of Bandura’s cognition theory: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Top. Stroke Rehabil., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 820–832, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2172832.

[18] C. G. Merrett, “Applying the IMPULSE method to second and fourth year aerospace engineering courses,” in AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, K1S 5B6, ON, Canada: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 2017. doi: 10.2514/6.2017-0297.

[19] A. Hosein and J. Harle, “The relationship between students’ prior mathematical attainment, knowledge and confidence on their self-assessment accuracy,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 56, pp. 32–41, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.10.008.

[20] A. Bandura, W. H. Freeman, and R. Lightsey, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, vol. 13, no. 2. New York: W. H. Freeman And Company, 1999. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158.

[21] A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy : Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychol. Riview, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977.

[22] A. Bandura, “Self-Efficacy In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior,” vol. 4, no. 1998, pp. 71–81, 1994.

[23] D. H. Schunk and M. K. DiBenedetto, “Self-efficacy and human motivation,” in Advances in Motivation Science, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States: Elsevier Ltd, 2021, pp. 153–179. doi: 10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001.

[24] D. H. Schunk and M. K. DiBenedetto, “Self-Efficacy: Education Aspects,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States: Elsevier Inc., 2015, pp. 515–521. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92019-1.

[25] N. M. Moussa, “Promoting Academic Achievement: The Role of Self-efficacy in Predicting Students’ Success in the Higher Education Settings,” Psychol. Sci. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 18–29, 2023, doi: 10.17759/pse.2023280202.

[26] Z. Y. Kalender, E. Marshman, C. D. Schunn, T. J. Nokes-Malach, and C. Singh, “Why female science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors do not identify with physics: They do not think others see them that way,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 15, no. 2, p. 20148, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020148.

[27] S. Yamtinah, B. Utami, B. Mulyani, M. Masykuri, M. Ulfa, and A. S. Shidiq, “Science teacher perception and readiness toward Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM),” in AIP Conference Proceedings, Chemistry Education Department, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia: American Institute of Physics Inc., 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0143127.

[28] A. A. Saefudin, N. W. Utami, and K. Aviory, “Teacher training for developing mathematical literacy problems,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics Inc., 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0105871.

[29] E. Zimmermann, M. F. Peschl, and B. Römmer-Nossek, “Constructivist curriculum design for the interdisciplinary study programme MEi:CogSci - A case study,” Constr. Found., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 144–157, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77957949593&partnerID=40&md5=a45bf6e50ef3fce04ae2c4aa5bca41be

[30] M. Boon, S. van Baalen, and M. Groenier, “Interdisciplinary expertise in medical practice: Challenges of using and producing knowledge in complex problem-solving,” Med. Teach., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 668–677, 2019, doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1544417.

[31] D. Zhang and J. Shen, “Disciplinary Foundations for Solving Interdisciplinary Scientific Problems,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 37, no. 15, pp. 2555–2576, 2015, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1085658.

[32] D. H. Palmer, “Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 337–353, 2006, doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-9007-0.

[33] T. I. Vaughan-Johnston and J. A. Jacobson, “Self-efficacy theory,” in The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, Models and Theories, Queen’s University, Canada: wiley, 2020, pp. 375–379. doi: 10.1002/9781119547143.ch62.

[34] E. Olivier, I. Archambault, M. De Clercq, and B. Galand, “Student Self-Efficacy, Classroom Engagement, and Academic Achievement: Comparing Three Theoretical Frameworks,” J. Youth Adolesc., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 326–340, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0952-0.

[35] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.

[36] S. Azwar, Penyusunan Skala Psikologi Yogyakarta, Cet. XIII. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.

[37] Mellyzar, “Hubungan Self-Efficacy dan Kemampuan Literai Numerasi Siswa: Ditinjau Berdasarkan Gender,” Lantanida J., vol. 9, no. 2, 2021.

[38] S. Hwang, “Examining the effect of students’ early numeracy activities at home on later mathematics achievement via early numeracy competencies and self-efficacy beliefs,” Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2020, doi: 10.26822/iejee.2020.172.

[39] Ageng Jelly Purwanto, “Pemahaman Siswa Kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Pujer Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal AKM Numerasi,” J. Math. Educ. Learn., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 109–115, 2021.

[40] M. Escobar, H. M. Majewski, M. Qazi, and Y. Rawajfih, “Self-efficacy in STEM,” in International Encyclopedia of Education: Fourth Edition, Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, United States: Elsevier, 2022, pp. 388–394. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.13049-0.

[41] E. Ramezanzade Tabriz, M. Sadeghi, E. Tavana, H. Heidarian Miri, and F. Heshmati Nabavi, “Approaches for boosting self-confidence of clinical nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 6, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27347.

[42] C. Connolly, E. Carr, and S. Knox, “Diving deep into numeracy, cross-curricular professional development,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1034–1053, 2023, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2021.1986160.

[43] D. Costa, D. Scaradozzi, L. Screpanti, and M. Callegari, “Guizzo Xp: A Robotic Toolkit for STEM Education and Raising Awareness of Aquatic Environment Protection,” in Mechanisms and Machine Science, DIISM, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy: Springer Science and Business Media B.V., 2023, pp. 155–163. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-25730-8_15.

[44] C. Connolly, R. Hijón-Neira, and S. Ó. Grádaigh, “Mobile learning to support computational thinking in initial teacher education: A case study,” Int. J. Mob. Blended Learn., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2021, doi: 10.4018/IJMBL.2021010104.

[45] K. E. S. Street, L.-E. Malmberg, and G. J. Stylianides, “Changes in students’ self-efficacy when learning a new topic in mathematics: a micro-longitudinal study,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 515–541, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10649-022-10165-1.

[46] W. D. Scott, D. Cervone, and O. U. Ebiringah, “The social-cognitive clinician: On the implications of social cognitive theory for psychotherapy and assessment,” Int. J. Psychol., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 616–623, 2024, doi: 10.1002/ijop.13125.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30