Development of Holistic Assessment Instruments Based on Local Wisdom of Silver Crafts in Kota Gede on Temperature and Heat Topic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v16i3.2112Keywords:
holistic assessment, local wisdom, temperature and heatAbstract
This study aims to develop an assessment instrument based on local wisdom that covers three domains in physics learning: affective, cognitive, and psychomotor domains, especially on temperature and heat topic. This instrument was developed to assess students' understanding of scientific concepts and attitudes after receiving temperature and heat material using interactive e-books, and remains relevant to the demands of the Merdeka Curriculum. The research method uses the Research and Development (R&D) approach with development stages including planning, compilation, validation, and limited trials. Data collection techniques include tests and observations. The cognitive instrument is in the form of a pretest and posttest with multiple-choice item types. The affective instrument is a statement to assess scientific attitudes such as curiosity, critical thinking, creativity, openness to criticism, and cooperation. The psychomotor instrument is in the form of an observation sheet to assess students' presentation skills. The results of the validity and reliability tests show that all instruments are included in the good category and are suitable for use, but improvements are needed in terms of the number of respondents and the number of items to produce higher reliability values. The results of this assessment instrument development not only support instructional practices, but also its primary contribution lies in its ability to evaluate the three domains of student assessment comprehensively, while simultaneously enriching the scientific discourse on holistic assessment based on local wisdom in physics education.
References
[1] Siregar R V, Lubis P K D, Azkiah F and Putri A 2024 Peran Penting Pendidikan dalam Pembentukan Sumber Daya Manusia Cerdas di Era Digitalisasi Menuju Smart Society 5.0 IJEDR Indones. J. Educ. Dev. Res. 2 1408–18
[2] Amir F, M M and Nur A A S 2024 Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots) Peserta Didik Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika J. Fis. dan Pembelajarannya 6 86–96
[3] Ekawatiningsih P 2015 Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Kompetensi Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Produktif di SMK invotec 11
[4] Adams W K and Wieman C E 2015 Analyzing the many skills involved in solving complex physics problems Am. J. Phys. 83 459–67
[5] Setiadi H 2016 Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013 J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik. 20 166–78
[6] Mukti H, Suastra I W and Aryana I B P 2022 Integrasi Etnosains dalam pembelajaran IPA JPGI (Jurnal Penelit. Guru Indones. 7 356–62
[7] Murti W W and Sunarti T 2021 Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Sains Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Di Trenggalek ORBITA J. Kajian, Inov. dan Apl. Pendidik. Fis. 7 33
[8] Sumarni W, Sudarmin, Wiyanto and Supartono 2016 The reconstruction of society indigenous science into scientific knowledge in the production process of palm sugar J. Turkish Sci. Educ. 13 281–92
[9] Angraeni D N, Suherman A and Guntara Y 2020 Aplikasi Rasch Model: Pengembangan Fluids Assessment (Fass) Berdasarkan Taxonomy of Introductory Physics Problems (TIPP) J. Penelit. Pembelajaran Fis. 11 135–43
[10] Cholifah S N and Novita D 2022 Pengembangan E-LKPD Guided Inquiry-Liveworksheet untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains pada Submateri Faktor Laju Reaksi Chem. Educ. Pract. 5 23–34
[11] Sugiyono 2019 Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Bandung: Alfabeta)
[12] Bond T G and M.Fox C 2015 Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group)
[13] Gliem J and Gliem R 2003 Calculating, Interpreting, And Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient For Likert-Type Scales 2003 Midwest Res. to Pract. Conf. Adult, Contin. Community Educ.
[14] Didik Setyawarno 2017 Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Butir Soal Dengan Analisis Aplikasi Quest Anal. Biochem. 11 1–5
[15] Robert L. Ebel D A F 1986 Essentials of Educational Measurement (Amerika Serikat: Prentice-Hall)
[16] Cohen J 1988 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science. In Lawrence Erlabaum Associates (2nd Edition). (New York: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates)
[17] Rampean B A O and Rohaeti E 2025 The development of an integrated instrument to measure higher order thinking skills and scientific attitudes J. Turkish Sci. Educ. 22 48–62
[18] Gendenjamts S 2023 Measuring Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Science Among Primary School Students Using Item Response Theory Eur. J. Educ. Stud. 10 19–28
[19] Kurniawan K, Sinaga P and Saepuzaman D 2025 Aiken’s V analysis and Rasch modeling to determine the quality of physics creative thinking test instruments J. Ris. dan Kaji. Pendidik. Fis. 12 32–40
[20] Fadilah N and . M 2019 Design and Content Validity Analysis of Physics Test based on Local Wisdom for High School Students Int. J. Educ. Res. Rev. 4 602–9
[21] Sari D K and Supahar 2018 The Content Validity of Assessment Instruments to Measure Analogical-Transfer Ability Int. Jorunal Sci. Basic Appl. Res. 39 165–72
[22] Mardikawati R A and Mundilarto M 2020 Development of Physics Communication Skill Instruments Based on Local Wisdom for Senior High School Students JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones. 9 236
[23] Diniya D, Muslim M, Rusdiana D, Permana N D, Andriani R, Sufarman A, Putri M D, Hermita N and Nuraeni F 2024 Analysis of the Aiken Index in the Development of Scientific Argumentation Written Test on Fluid Mechanics Course (Atlantis Press SARL)
[24] Riduwan 2012 Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian (Jakarta: Alfabeta)
[25] Arikunto S 2021 Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3 (Jakarta: PT BUMI AKSARA)
[26] Ebel and Frisbie 2009 Essentials Of Educational Measurement 5Th Ed. (Prentice-Hall Of India Pvt. Limited)
[27] Maric D, Fore G A, Nyarko S C and Varma-Nelson P 2023 Measurement in STEM education research: a systematic literature review of trends in the psychometric evidence of scales Int. J. STEM Educ. 10
[28] Singh T 2024 Validity in student assessment: Implications for competency-based curriculum Indian J. Heal. Sci. Biomed. Res. KLEU 17 1–4
[29] Menon V, Grover S, Gupta S, Indu P V., Chacko D and Vidhukumar K 2025 A primer on reliability testing of a rating scale Indian J. Psychiatry 67 725–9
[30] Hardianti H, Liliawati W and Tayubi Y R 2023 Karakteristik tes kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi momentum dan impuls: Perbandingan classical theory test (CTT) dan model Rasch WaPFi (Wahana Pendidik. Fis. 8 21–8
[31] Arikunto S 2021 Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3 (Jakarta: PT BUMI AKSARA)
[32] Adawiyah R and Wisudawati A W 2017 Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berbasis Literasi Sains : Menilai Pemahaman Fenomena Ilmiah Mengenai Energi Indones. J. Curric. 5 112–21
[33] Susac A, Planinic M, Klemencic D and Milin Sipus Z 2018 Using the Rasch model to analyze the test of understanding of vectors Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 14 1–6
