Development of A Multidimensional Assessment Instrument on the Topic of Torque
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v16i4.2848Keywords:
instrument development, multidimensional assessment, torqueAbstract
This research focuses on the development of a multidimensional assessment instrument aimed at evaluating high school students’ learning outcomes in the topic of torque within physics education. The instrument integrates cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains through a combination of multiple-choice questions for conceptual understanding and Likert-scale questionnaires for assessing students’ interest and communication skills. The development process followed a systematic model consisting of planning, instrument construction, and pilot testing. The trial was conducted with 22 eleventh-grade students from SMAN 1 Dlingo, Bantul, Indonesia, selected via random sampling. Content validity was assessed using Aiken’s V index, while internal consistency reliability was measured using Cronbach’s Alpha with SPSS version 26.0. The results indicated that all items demonstrated high content validity (V > 0.87) and acceptable to excellent reliability coefficients: 0.74 for cognitive, 0.81 for affective, and 0.93 for psychomotor components. These findings affirm that the developed instrument is both valid and reliable, making it suitable for comprehensive evaluation of student learning outcomes in physics. Practically, the instrument enables teachers to diagnose students’ conceptual mastery, motivation, and communication skills in an integrated manner, especially for abstract topics like torque. The novelty of this research lies in its multidomain assessment design tailored to the challenges of physics learning in the Indonesian high school context, supporting differentiated instruction and holistic evaluation aligned with the curriculum.
References
[1] Nurjannah H, Saputro A, Maddatuang M and Fikri M J N 2020 Implementation of the Treffinger Learning Model in Geography Instruction LaGeografia 19 113–127
[2] Sufyadi S 2021 Learning and Assessment Guidelines for Elementary and Secondary Education Levels, Assessment and Learning Center, Research and Development and Book Agency, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology, 1.
[3] Lee Y W and Sawaki Y 2009 Cognitive diagnosis approaches to language assessment: an overview Lang. Assess. Q. 6 172–189
[4] Hati S M 2021 The Effectiveness of Using the Quizizz Application in Conducting Non-Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments of Grade 12 Social Studies Students with Cross-Interests at YPHB Senior High School, Bogor City Arus Journal of Education 1 70
[5] Aulia M, Normilawati, Yuliani H and Azizah N 2021 Needs Analysis of Contextual-Based Comic Learning Media for Torque Material in Senior High School J. Sci. Educ. Phys.–COMPTON 8 72–81
[6] Permana S A A, Rohman M M, Arta D N C, Bani M D and Bani G A 2023 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods: Theory and Practice (Yogyakarta: GET Press Indonesia) ISBN 978-623-198-668-9 ed Sulung N
[7] Feng S, Lu C, Shen S, Ning N, Wang M, Wang S 2025 Identifying students’ cognitive-affective profiles and associations with gender and behaviors in virtual scientific inquiry Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 73
[8] Schneider S, Beege M, Nebel S, Schnaubert L, Rey GD 2022 The Cognitive-Affective-Social Theory Of Learning In Digital Environments (CASTLE) Educational Psychology Review 34 1-38
[9] Fossa and Cortés-Rivera C 2023 Affectivity and Learning: Bridging the Gap Between Neurosciences, Cultural and Cognitive Psychology Springer
[10] Saftari M and Fajriah N 2019 Assessment of the Affective Domain through Attitude Scale Evaluation to Measure Learning Outcomes Edutainment: Journal of Educational Science and Pedagogy 7
[11] Van der Voet and B. Steijn 2021 Team innovation through collaboration: How visionary leadership spurs innovation via team cohesion Public Manage. Rev. 23 1275–1294
[12] Yusup F 2018 Validity and Reliability Testing of Quantitative Research Instruments Tarbiyah: Journal of Educational Science 7
[13] Kusumawati A E, Supahar and Pebriana I N 2024 Development of Assessment Instruments on Global Warming to Measure Students’ Science Process and Collaboration Skills Diffraction: Journal for Physics Education and Applied Physics 6
[14] Istiyono E 2020 Development of Assessment Instruments and Analysis of Physics Learning Outcomes Using Classical and Modern Test Theories (Yogyakarta: UNY Press)
[15] Aiken L R 1985 Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings Educ. Psychol. Meas. 45 131–142
[16] Normilawati, Aulia M, Yuliani H and Azizah N 2021 Description of the Requirement For Contextual-Based Comic Learning Media On Torque Material In High School Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika-COMPTON 8 72–81
[17] Rafika R and Syuhendri S 2021 Students’ Misconceptions On Rotational And Rolling Motions Journal of Physics: Conference Series
[18] Oriondo L L and Antonio E M 1998 Evaluating Educational Outcomes: Tests, Measurement and Evaluation (Quezon City: Rex Book Store)
[19] Puri P R A and Perdana R 2023 Analysis of Senior High School Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Static Fluid and Its Improvement through the Visualization Auditory Kinesthetic Learning Model Magneton: Journal of Innovation in Physics Learning 1 93–101
[20] Gultom C, Sihombing R and Harahap S H 2024 Evaluation of Oral Communication Proficiency in Indonesian Language Learning (Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan)
[21] Marfuah 2017 Enhancing Students’ Communication Skills through the Jigsaw-Type Cooperative Learning Model JPIS: Journal of Social Science Education 26 148–160
[22] Nurdanti V Y 2020 The Influence of Learning Interest on Students’ Physics Learning Outcomes Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education 1 101–106
[23] Mohd Rokeman 2024 Likert Measurement Scale in Education and Social Sciences: Explored and Explained EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences 10 84–94
[24] Nunnally and Bernstein I H 1944 Psychometric Theory 3rd ed. (New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill)
[25] Barbera M M, VandenPlas and Stains J M 2021 Reliability and construct validity of the affective dimension of the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for Chemistry,” J. Chem. 98 519–529
