Analysis of Claims and Dispute Resolution in Construction Projects: a Case Study Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i3.2460Keywords:
Construction Claims, Dispute Resolution, Causal FactorsAbstract
Disputes in construction projects are often inevitable due to various factors such as delays, cost overruns, and changes in scope. This study aims to identify the root causes of claims and examine the resolution strategies implemented in the Sierra Intercultural School construction project. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with contractors, consultants, and owners, as well as analysis of supporting documents such as contracts and site reports. The study found that the most frequent claim types were time extension claims (37%), additional cost claims (28%), and design change claims (21%). These were primarily caused by design errors, late approvals, and incomplete work planning. Dispute resolution predominantly relied on negotiation and direct discussion, without involving formal legal or arbitration procedures. The findings indicate that effective contract documentation and proactive communication among stakeholders can significantly reduce claim occurrence. This research contributes to the field of construction management by offering practical insights into dispute avoidance and resolution mechanisms in medium-scale educational infrastructure projects. It also highlights the importance of early stakeholder alignment to prevent claims and delays in similar future developments.
References
[1] I. M. C. S. Illankoon, V. W. Tam, K. N. Le, and K. A. T. O. Ranadewa, “Causes of disputes, factors affecting dispute resolution and effective alternative dispute resolution for Sri Lankan construction industry,” Int. J. Constr. Manag., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 218–228, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1616415
[2] G. J. Kikwasi, “Claims in construction projects: How causes are linked to effects?,” J. Eng. Des. Technol., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1710–1724, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-06-2021-0312
[3] S. K. Viswanathan, A. Panwar, S. Kar, R. Lavingiya, and K. N. Jha, “Causal modeling of disputes in construction projects,” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr., vol. 12, no. 4, p. 04520035, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000432
[4] S. Matarneh, “Construction disputes causes and resolution methods: A case study from a de-veloping country,” J. Constr. Dev. Ctries., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 139–161, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc-04-23-0043
[5] S. El-Sayegh et al., “Construction disputes in the UAE: Causes and resolution methods,” Buildings, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 171, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10100171
[6] A. N. Indahwati, S. Sami’an, and S. Hardjomuljadi, “Arbitration in Resolving Construction Cost Claim Disputes Due to Time Extensions: A Study of Contract Law in Indonesia,” SIGn J. Huk., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 263–281, 2024. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.388
[7] M. Saygili, I. E. Mert, and O. B. Tokdemir, “A decentralized structure to reduce and resolve construction disputes in a hybrid blockchain network,” Autom. Constr., vol. 134, p. 104056, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104056.
[8] M. Saygili, I. E. Mert, and O. B. Tokdemir, “A decentralized structure to reduce and resolve construction disputes in a hybrid blockchain network,” Autom. Constr., vol. 134, p. 104056, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104056.
[9] R. F. Herrera, O. Sánchez, K. Castañeda, and H. Porras, “Cost overrun causative factors in road infrastructure projects: A frequency and importance analysis,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 16, p. 5506, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165506
[10] L. Rivera, H. Baguec Jr., and C. Yeom, “A study on causes of delay in road construction pro-jects across 25 developing countries,” Infrastructures, vol. 5, no. 10, p. 84, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5100084
[11] A. Amadi, "Integration in a mixed-method case study of construction phenomena: From data to theory," Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 210–237, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2021-0111
[12] S. Hansen, S. F. Rostiyanti, and D. Septaria, “Negotiating construction change order claims,” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr., vol. 16, no. 2, p. 03724001, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-961
[13] F. Fassa and A. Wibowo, “Issues and Challenges of Employing the Design-Build Contract System in Government Construction Projects: Lessons Learned from the Gelora Bung Karno Project,” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr., vol. 16, no. 3, p. 05024002, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1114
[14] F. Antoniou and A. V. Tsioulpa, “Assessing the delay, cost, and quality risks of claims on construction contract performance,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 333, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020333
[15] A. A. Hassan, M. S. Mohd-Danuri, M. H. Mustafa, M. A. Berawi, and L. W. Yang, “Explor-ing Mediation Practices in Malaysian Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Re-view,” Int. J. Technol., vol. 16, no. 2, 2025. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v16i2.7073
[16] F. L. Zulfiqar, T. Prasetia, and I. G. K. A. Ulupui, “Tax incentives and social spending amidst COVID-19: A VECM analysis in a subnational government (case of Jakarta province, Indone-sia),” J. Tax Reform, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 243–260, 2025. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2025.11.1.200
[17] R. R. Sebastian, B. Wisatrioda, S. Sami’an, and S. Hardjomuljadi, “Resolving Construction Disputes through Negotiation: A Case Study of Amendments to the Environmental Impact Assessment for an Electricity Infrastructure Project,” SIGn J. Huk., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 282–295, 2024. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.389
[18] P. A. Indra and Y. Latief, “Evaluation of Construction Contract Administration at the Ministry of Public Works related to Risks Based on LKPP Regulation No. 12/2021 and FIDIC Red Book to Avoid Claims,” unpublished.
[19] K. Z. H. Goh, S. Y. Wong, and W. W. Low, “Factors Causing Dispute in Construction Indus-try: Contractors’ Perspectives,” J. Surv. Constr. Prop., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 14–26, 2023. https://doi.org/10.22452/jscp.vol14no1.2
[20] L. Liao, N. Wei, C. Zheng, Y. Ye, and Y. Chen, “Understanding causes for construction claims in hydropower projects,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 39, no. 5, p. 04023032, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5247
[21] K. P. Kisi, N. Lee, R. Kayastha, and J. Kovel, “Alternative dispute resolution practices in international road construction contracts,” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 04520001, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000373
[22] S. El-Sayegh et al., “Construction disputes in the UAE: Causes and resolution methods,” Buildings, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 171, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10100171
[23] R. Muhammad and A. R. Nasir, “Integrating BIM in construction dispute resolution: Devel-opment of a contractual framework,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 1828, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111828
[24] A. D. Ness, “Neutral evaluation: Another tool in the ADR toolbox,” Constr. Law., vol. 40, p. 5, 2020.
[25] K. P. Kisi, N. Lee, R. Kayastha, and J. Kovel, “Alternative dispute resolution practices in international road construction contracts,” J. Legal Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 04520001, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000373
[26] F. Antoniou and A. V. Tsioulpa, “Assessing the delay, cost, and quality risks of claims on construction contract performance,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 333, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020333
[27] A. Klarin and Q. Xiao, “Automation in architecture, engineering and construction: a scien-tometric analysis and implications for management,” Engineering, Construction and Architec-tural Management, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 3308–3334, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2022-0770
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Advance Sustainable Science Engineering and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
