Transit-Oriented Development and Integrated Urban Transport Systems: Technical Assessment and Case Study of Cirebon Station, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i4.2698Keywords:
Accessibility, cirebon station, integrated urban transport systems, transit-oriented development, urban planningAbstract
This study is an empirical case study that evaluates the potential for developing the area surrounding Cirebon Station into a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) zone. The research uses a mixed-method approach, combining descriptive–qualitative spatial analysis with quantitative survey-based modeling. Spatial data were generated through field observation, interviews, and GIS mapping within an 800-meter radius of the station, while primary quantitative data were obtained from a purposive sample of 33 respondents (n = 33) who have direct involvement or knowledge of the station area. Descriptive statistics were used to describe existing conditions and respondent characteristics, while correlation and linear regression analyses were applied to examine the influence of TOD on the Integrated Urban Transportation System. The results show a moderate positive relationship between TOD and integrated transportation performance, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.550. The regression model produces a coefficient of determination of R² = 0.302, indicating that 30.2% of the variation in the Integrated Urban Transportation System can be explained by TOD factors such as accessibility, transport mode integration, land-use optimization, and public facility provision, while the remaining 69.8% is influenced by other variables not captured in the model. Despite these positive results, the findings should be interpreted cautiously due to key limitations, including a small sample size (n = 33) and moderate instrument reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.602), which may constrain the statistical power and generalizability of the results. From an engineering and planning perspective, the results imply that prioritizing TOD-based interventions such as improving pedestrian access, integrating public transport modes, and coordinating land-use zoning around Cirebon Station can significantly strengthen urban transport integration and reduce reliance on private vehicles. Future work should expand the sample size, improve measurement reliability, and incorporate additional explanatory variables to develop more robust TOD implementation models for corridor-scale urban transport planning.
References
[1] Akiner ME. Integrated Modeling Approach to Predict the Morphodynamic Impacts of the Boğaçay Project on Konyaaltı Beach. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education 2025;7:97–108. https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v7i2.215.
[2] Hasibuan HS, Mulyani M. Transit-Oriented Development: Towards Achieving Sustainable Transport and Urban Development in Jakarta Metropolitan, Indonesia. Sustainability 2022;14:5244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095244.
[3] Ho H-C, Venessa V, Sopha BM. Redesigning Passenger Distribution System of KRL Commuter Line: An Integrative Approach. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS) 2025;7:84–100. https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v7i1.6954.
[4] Nasional BPP. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2020-2024. Jakarta: Bappenas 2020.
[5] Button KJ, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P. Land-use, transportation and urban development 2005. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0573-8555(2005)0000266007.
[6] Subkhan MF, Astuti ES, Kusumawati A, Sunarti S. Engineering-Oriented Transit QoS and Perceived Value: Predicting Passenger Satisfaction and Behavioral Intentions in Urban Public Transport. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education 2026;8:79–96. https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v8i1.427.
[7] Venessa, Ho H-C. Elevating Comfort: Redesigning the KRL Commuter Line for a Better Passenger Experience. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1488, IOP Publishing; 2025, p. 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1488/1/012013.
[8] Shamskooshki H. Toward mixed-use communities by transit-oriented development (TOD) in the United States. na; 2012.
[9] Dittmar H, Ohland G. The new transit town: Best practices in transit-oriented development. Island Press; 2012.
[10] Calthorpe P. The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton architectural press; 1993.
[11] Zhang M. Chinese edition of transit-oriented development. Transp Res Rec 2007;2038:120–7. https://doi.org/10.3141/2038-16.
[12] Nasri A, Zhang L. Assessing the impact of metropolitan-level, county-level, and local-level built environment on travel behavior: Evidence from 19 US urban areas. J Urban Plan Dev 2014;141:04014031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000226.
[13] Dirgahayani P, Yesuari AP, Wulansari TR, Sutanto H. The formation of network governance in accelerating the implementation of TOD: The case of Jakarta MRT Phase 1, Indonesia. Case Stud Transp Policy 2020;8:1412–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.10.006.
[14] Yap JBH, Chua CY, Skitmore M. Towards sustainable mobility with transit-oriented development (TOD): understanding greater Kuala Lumpur. Planning Practice & Research 2021;36:314–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2021.1883249.
[15] Darmawan R, Prasetyo WA, Irawan A, Hariani ML. Analysis of Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Principles to Support Sustainable Transportation in Urban Areas. Journal of World Science 2024;3:1323–9. https://doi.org/10.58344/jws.v3i10.1213.
[16] Fitri ER. Perancangan Kawasan TOD (Transit Oriented Development) Di Stasiun Cirebon. Institut teknologi Bandung, 2024.
[17] Widita A, Ikaputra, Widyastuti DT. TOD-related features and station-level ridership: insights from the Jakarta Metropolitan Area, Indonesia: A. Widita et al. Public Transport 2025;17:505–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-024-00369-4.
[18] Ibraeva A, de Almeida Correia GH, Silva C, Antunes AP. Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 2020;132:110–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.10.018.
[19] Yip MKF, Ramezani S, Meijering L, Tillema T, Arts J. Conceptualising justice in transit-oriented development (TOD): towards an analytical framework. Transp Rev 2024;44:944–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2024.2346761.
[20] Niger M, Sinthia SA. Integrating metro stations with the adjacent Urban fabric using TOD principles: A case of Agargaon metro station, Dhaka. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs 2025;9:95–114. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2025.v9n1-6.
[21] Gu X, Lin S, Wang C. Integrated impact of urban mixed land use on TOD ridership. J Transp Land Use 2024;17:457–81. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2024.2462.
[22] Qiang D, Zhang L, Huang X. Quantitative evaluation of TOD performance based on multi-source data: a case study of Shanghai. Front Public Health 2022;10:820694. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.820694.
[23] Ibrahim SMSZ. Planning transit-oriented development (TOD): a systematic literature review of measuring the transit-oriented development levels. Systematic Review 2022. https://doi.org/10.2495/TDI-V6-N4-378-398.
[24] Zhang Z, Cao B, Adalaiti A, Lu L, Fang X. Comprehensive Evaluation of Transit‐Oriented Development (TOD) Guidance Systems: A Case Study of Shanghai TODs. Advances in Civil Engineering 2025;2025:6651620. https://doi.org/10.1155/adce/6651620.
[25] Abdullah R, Xavier BD, Namgung H, Varghese V, Fujiwara A. Managing transit-oriented development: A comparative analysis of expert groups and multi-criteria decision making methods. Sustain Cities Soc 2024;115:105871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105871
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Advance Sustainable Science Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


