Effect of Dimple Topology and Ball Mass on the Aerodynamic and Flight Performance of Golf Balls

Authors

  • Agus Baharudin Universitas Negeri Padang Indonesia
  • Yao-Hsuan Tsai National Tsing Hua University Taiwan, Province of China
  • Chen-Hsiang Chen National Tsing Hua University Taiwan, Province of China
  • Dwi Sudarno Putra Universitas Negeri Padang Indonesia
  • Wawan Purwanto Universitas Negeri Padang Indonesia
  • M. Yasep Setiawan Universitas Negeri Padang Indonesia
  • Ahmad Arif Universitas Negeri Padang Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i4.3707

Keywords:

Golf Ball Dimple Pattern, Particle Image Velocimetry, Flow Visualisation, trajectory analysis, uncertainty analysis

Abstract

The flight performance of a golf ball is governed by its surface geometry, which controls boundary-layer transition, separation and wake formation, yet the effects of convex surface topology and of ball mass remain underexplored. This study experimentally compares three surface patterns of identical diameter and feature count: conventional circular dimples (baseline), hexagonal dimples and circular convex protrusions. Wake fields were characterised in a closed-loop water tunnel by Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and dye visualisation at Re = 1.5×10³ - 6.7×10³, and drag and lift were measured in a wind tunnel at Re = 2.9×10⁴ - 1.12×10⁵ with a combined uncertainty analysis. Over Re = 5.8×10⁴–1.1×10⁵ the baseline has the lowest drag at every test point, the convex and hexagonal patterns exceeding it by 5.8 ± 0.9 % and 5.1 ± 1.0 % on average, while the convex ball shows a pronounced negative-lift regime at intermediate Re. The measured CD(Re) and CL(Re) were applied to a two-dimensional, no-spin trajectory model with Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation at the regulation mass (45.93 g) and at 190 g. At regulation mass the ball decelerates into the negative-lift regime of the convex pattern, and the baseline carries 3.6 - 6.0 m farther than the convex ball for launch angles of 15.7° - 46.8°; at 190 g the ball remains above this regime and the two patterns become indistinguishable at a shallow launch angle. This Reynolds-number-mediated pattern–mass coupling provides a fluid-mechanical rationale for the dominance of circular dimples on regulation balls.

Author Biographies

  • Agus Baharudin, Universitas Negeri Padang

    Department of Automotive Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Air Tawar, Padang 25131, West Sumatra, Indonesia

  • Yao-Hsuan Tsai, National Tsing Hua University

    Department of Power Mechanical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, No. 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan

  • Chen-Hsiang Chen, National Tsing Hua University

    Department of Power Mechanical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, No. 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan

  • Dwi Sudarno Putra, Universitas Negeri Padang

    Department of Automotive Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Air Tawar, Padang 25131, West Sumatra, Indonesia

  • Wawan Purwanto, Universitas Negeri Padang

    Department of Automotive Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Air Tawar, Padang 25131, West Sumatra, Indonesia

  • M. Yasep Setiawan, Universitas Negeri Padang

    Department of Automotive Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Air Tawar, Padang 25131, West Sumatra, Indonesia

  • Ahmad Arif, Universitas Negeri Padang

    Department of Automotive Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Air Tawar, Padang 25131, West Sumatra, Indonesia

References

[1] Z. Abbas, S. I. A. Shah, A. Javed, and M. Jamil, “Influence of Dimple Design on Aerodynamic Drag of Golf Balls,” 6th Int. Conf. Aerosp. Sci. Eng. ICASE 2019, pp. 1–7, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASE48783.2019.9059229.

[2] B. Lyu, J. Kensrud, and L. Smith, “The reverse Magnus effect in golf balls,” Sport. Eng., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-020-0318-1.

[3] K. Moriyama and H. Okanaga, “Effect of dimple shape, occupancy, and volume ratio on aerodynamic characteristics of golf balls during rotation,” Trans. JSME (in Japanese), vol. 89, no. 924, pp. 23-00083-23–00083, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1299/transjsme.23-00083.

[4] K. Moriyama and H. Okanaga, “Effects of golf ball dimple surface occupancy, volume ratio and depth on aerodynamic characteristics during rotation,” Sport. Eng., vol. 26, no. 1, p. 10, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-023-00400-0.

[5] S. K. Ayed, L. J. Habeeb, and E. S. Mohammed, “Numerical and experimental study of flow around a golf ball with dimples by Laser-Doppler anemometer technique,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2787, no. 1, p. 30025, Jul. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0148215.

[6] S. Hong, J. E. Goff, and T. Asai, “The Aerodynamics of New Design Soccer Balls Using a Three-Dimensional Printer,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14093932.

[7] F. Alam et al., “A study of golf ball aerodynamic drag,” Procedia Eng., vol. 13, pp. 226–231, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.05.077.

[8] S. Hong and T. Asai, “Aerodynamic effects of dimples on soccer ball surfaces,” Heliyon, vol. 3, no. 10, p. e00432, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00432.

[9] N. Beratlis, E. Balaras, and K. Squires, “On the origin of the drag force on dimpled spheres,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 879, pp. 147–167, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.647.

[10] X. He, Y. Liu, H. Zhan, Y. Liu, L. Zhao, and S. Feng, “Bidirectional Underwater Drag Reduction on Bionic Flounder Two-Tier Structural Surfaces,” Biomimetics, vol. 8, no. 1, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010116.

[11] P. Zhao, X. Li, Z. Luo, Z. Jia, K. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Research on Drag Reduction for Flexible Skin Inspired by Bionics,” Coatings, vol. 14, no. 9, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14091189.

[12] R. W. Jackson, E. Harberd, G. D. Lock, and J. A. Scobie, “Investigation of reverse swing and magnus effect on a cricket ball using particle image velocimetry,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10227990.

[13] K. E. T. Giljarhus, M. T. Gooding, and J. Njærheim, “Disc golf trajectory modelling combining computational fluid dynamics and rigid body dynamics,” Sport. Eng., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-022-00390-5.

[14] W. J. McNally, J. Lambeth, and D. Brekke, “Combining Physics and Deep Learning Models to Simulate the Flight of a Golf Ball,” in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. Workshops (CVPRW), 2023, pp. 5119–5128, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW59228.2023.00540.

[15] S. Scharnowski and C. J. Kähler, “Particle image velocimetry - Classical operating rules from today’s perspective,” Opt. Lasers Eng., vol. 135, no. February, p. 106185, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106185.

[16] A. Capone, F. Di Felice, and F. A. Pereira, “Flow-Particle Coupling in a Channel Flow Laden with Elongated Particles: The Role of Aspect Ratio,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 9, no. 12, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9121388.

[17] S. Singh, A. Pothérat, C. C. T. Pringle, I. R. J. Bates, and M. Holdsworth, “Simultaneous Eulerian–Lagrangian velocity measurements of particulate pipe flow in transitional regime,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 91, no. 9, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5129062.

[18] T. Asai and S. Hong, “Aerodynamics of the newly approved football for the English Premier League 2020–21 season,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89162-y.

[19] S. Hong, H. Ozaki, K. Watanabe, and T. Asai, “Aerodynamic characteristics of new volleyball for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093256.

[20] J. R. Kensrud and L. V. Smith, “Drag and lift measurements of solid sports balls in still air,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part P J. Sport. Eng. Technol., vol. 232, no. 3, pp. 255–263, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337117740749.

[21] The R&A and USGA, Rules of Equipment, Part 4: Conformance of Balls, St Andrews and Liberty Corner, NJ, 2023.

[22] L. Smith and A. Sciacchitano, “Baseball Drag Measurements in Free Flight,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031416.

[23] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Evaluation of Measurement Data — Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, JCGM 100:2008, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM100-2008E.

[24] A. Sciacchitano and B. Wieneke, “PIV uncertainty propagation,” Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 27, no. 8, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/8/084006.

[25] J. B. Bogdanović-Jovanović and Ž. M. Stamenković, “Experimental and CFD analysis of MHD flow around smooth sphere and sphere with dimples in subcritical and critical regimes,” Therm. Sci., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1781–1794, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI200430197B.

[26] H. Ali, M. R. Rasani, Z. Harun, and M. A. Shahid, “Passive flow-field control using dimples for improved aerodynamic flow over a wing,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63638-z.

[27] H. Ali, M. R. Rasani, and Z. Harun, “Impact of the dimple indentation depth and location for passive flow control in Blended Wing Body airframe at low and high subsonic speeds,” PLoS One, vol. 20, no. 7 July, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325778.

[28] S. A. Ali, R. B. Al-Tameemi, M. H. Rasheed, and A. M. Ashour, “Numerical Simulation of Mixed Convection Heat Transfer in a Vehicle Cabin with Variable Aspect Ratios Using CFD,” Adv. Sustain. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 8, no. 2, Art. no. 02602023, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i2.2638.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31