AI-Based Decision Support System for Learning Growth Performance Workforce Use Certainty Factor and Constraint Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i4.3719Keywords:
Artifical Intelligence, Expert System, certainty Factor, Based modeling, Decision Support System, Workforce Performance, PLS-SEM, NCAAbstract
This study presents the design and computational evaluation of an AI-based decision support system for workforce performance in an AI-driven environment under constrained conditions. Previous research has largely emphasized technological determinants and adequate conditions, while neglecting the constraint mechanisms that limit achievable performance. To address this gap, this study integrates Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) into a unified computational framework. Empirical data from 200 manufacturing workers was used to derive model parameters. The results identified Engagement Level as a key performance driver (β = 0.519), while Self-Regulation Ability emerged as a critical constraint (d = 0.189). These findings were operationalized into a Certainty Factor-based expert system that models performance as a function of positive contribution, negative influence, and constraint thresholds. The proposed model was evaluated using classification metrics, achieving 87% accuracy, 0.85 precision, 0.86 recall, and an F1-score of 0.85. The results demonstrate strong predictive capabilities and confirm that performance is jointly determined by enabling and constraining factors. This study contributes by bridging statistical analysis and AI system design, providing a constraint-aware decision support model for performance evaluation in complex operational environments.
References
[1] Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2019;28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.
[2] Mikalef P, Gupta M. Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information and Management 2021;58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434.
[3] Davenport T, Guha A, Grewal D, Bressgott T. How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. J Acad Mark Sci 2020;48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0.
[4] Shrestha YR, Ben-Menahem SM, von Krogh G. Organizational Decision-Making Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Calif Manage Rev 2019;61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257.
[5] Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. J Occup Health Psychol 2017;22. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056.
[6] Raisch S. Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review 2021;46:192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2018.0072.
[7] Lucchese A, Panagou S, Sgarbossa F. Investigating the impact of cognitive assistive technologies on human performance and well-being: an experimental study in assembly and picking tasks. Int J Prod Res 2025;63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2394090.
[8] Sarstedt M, Moisescu OI. Mediation analysis in PLS-SEM: A comprehensive review and practical guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems 2024;124:385–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2023-0421.
[9] Dul J. Necessary condition analysis (NCA): Logic and methodology of ``necessary but not sufficient’’ causality. Organ Res Methods 2016;19:10–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115584005.
[10] Giarratano, J. C. dan Riley GD. Expert Systems Principles and Programming Fourth Edition. Boston, Massachusetts: Thomson Course Technology 2005.
[11] Saks AM. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness 2019;6. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034.
[12] Tarafdar M, Pullins EB, Ragu-Nathan TS. Technostress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal 2015;25. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042.
[13] El Maalouf N, Bahemia H. The implementation of inbound open innovation at the firm level: A dynamic capability perspective. Technovation 2023;122:102659. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102659.
[14] Warner KSR. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Plann 2019;52:326–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001.
[15] Gharibdousti MS. Performance Evaluation of Organizations Based on Human Factor Engineering Using Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (FDEA). Journal of Soft Computing in Civil Engineering 2019;3:63–90. https://doi.org/10.22115/SCCE.2019.177180.1101.
[16] Gürbüz S, Joosen MCW, Kooij DTAM, Bakker AB, van der Klink JJL, Brouwers EPM. Measuring sustainable employability: psychometric properties of the capability set for work questionnaire. BMC Public Health 2022;22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13609-8.
[17] Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd ed. SAGE Publications; 2019.
[18] Hartley R. Rotation averaging. Int J Comput Vis 2013;103:267–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-012-0601-0.
[19] Egasmara F, Rahayu A, Wibowo LA, Rofaida R, Sofia A, Fauziyah A. Workforce planning optimization utilising AI to improve firm performance: a systematic literature review using VOSviewer. Journal of Work-Applied Management 2025. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-06-2025-0102.
[20] Harmel RD, Smith PK, Migliaccio KW. Modifying goodness-of-fit indicators to incorporate both measurement and model uncertainty in model calibration and validation. Trans ASABE 2010;53:55–63. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.29502.
[21] Chicco D, Jurman G. The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics 2020;21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7.
[22] Manurung KH, Hayati N, Shofia A, Syaputra AE. Decision Support System For Student Activity Unit Selection Using Certainty Factor Method. Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence Journal 2024;4:532–40. https://doi.org/0.31763/iota.v4i3.794.
[23] Neiroukh S, Emeagwali OL, Aljuhmani HY. Artificial intelligence capability and organizational performance: unraveling the mediating mechanisms of decision-making processes. Management Decision 2025;63:3501–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-1946.
[24] Maulida IS, Handayati R, Nurcholidah L, Lazuardi Y, Sulaeman MM. Entrepreneurial Transformation through the Utilization of Artificial Intelligence: Impact on Product Innovation and Business Sustainability. Technology and Society Perspectives (TACIT) 2024;2:271–7. https://doi.org/10.61100/tacit.v2i3.232.
[25] Kwiotkowska A. Impact of AI capability, digital strategy, and digital maturity on organisational performance. Engineering Management in Production and Services 2025;17:15–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2025-0024.
[26] Liu S, Mei Y. How does artificial intelligence adoption shape employee performance? A novel exploration of mimetic artificial intelligence performance through a hybrid approach based on PLS-SEM and ANN. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2026;222:124387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124387.
[27] Bley K, Fredriksen SFB, Skjærvik ME, Pappas IO. The role of organizational culture on artificial intelligence capabilities and organizational performance. Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, 2022, p. 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_2.
[28] Yang X, Zhu C. Industrial expert systems review: A comprehensive analysis of typical applications. IEEE Access 2024;12:88558–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3419047.
[29] Yang M, Jaafar N, Al Mamun A, Salameh AA, Nawi NC. Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM–neural network analysis. J Innov Entrep 2022;11:44. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010340.
[30] Tang PM, Koopman J, Yam KC, De Cremer D, Zhang JH, Reynders P. The self-regulatory consequences of dependence on intelligent machines at work: Evidence from field and experimental studies. Hum Resour Manage 2023;62:721–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22154.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Advance Sustainable Science Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





