Exploring Students' Perceptions of Using the ChatGPT Voice Conversation Feature for Informal English-Speaking Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/jettle.v2i2.4196Keywords:
ChatGPT Voice Conversation, Informal Speaking Practice, Qualitative Descriptive, AI in Language LearningAbstract
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially with generative AI chatbots, is opening innovative options for autonomous language learning. This qualitative descriptive study investigates university students’ impressions of utilizing the ChatGPT Voice Conversation function for informal English speaking practice. Twelve Indonesian university students of English education major who used the feature to practice speaking by themselves for four weeks were selected by purposive sampling technique and then interviewed using semi-structured interview. The data collected were examined using Braun and Clarke thematic analysis methodology. The preliminary data suggest that students view the ChatGPT Voice Conversation feature as a low-anxiety, highly accessible and interactive tool that helps them improve speaking fluency and learn vocabulary. However, several significant shortcomings were detected including technical constraints such as occasional odd prosody, conversational disconnects and the absence of non-verbal cues. The study suggests that AI speech features, while useful as scaffolding for informal conversation, should be used to supplement, not substitute for, human-human contact in language instruction
References
[1] Richards JC. Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
[2] MacIntyre PD, Gardner RC. The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning 1994;44:283–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01103.x.
[3] Krashen SD. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press; 1982.
[4] Bin Hentasmaka M. Utilizing ChatGPT as an autonomous vocabulary learning tool for EFL university students. Journal of Digital Learning and Education 2023;3:89–98. https://doi.org/10.53623/jdle.v3i2.245.
[5] Kohnke L, Moorhouse BL, Zou D. ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal 2023;54:537–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868.
[6] Stockwell G. Mobile-assisted language learning: Concepts, contexts and challenges. Cambridge University Press; 2022.
[7] Kukulska-Hulme A, Shield L. An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL 2008;20:271–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335.
[8] Kohnke L. Artificial intelligence in language education: Leveraging large language models for autonomous growth. Routledge; 2024.
[9] Fryer LK, Coniam D. Bot talks back: Auditing learner motivation and trust over a year-long chatbot intervention. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2014;27:545–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.771844.
[10] Holec H. Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon Press; 1981.
[11] Dressman M, Sadler RW, editors. The handbook of informal language learning. Wiley-Blackwell; 2020.
[12] Jeon J, Lee S. Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies 2023;28:15873–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1.
[13] Yan D. Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies 2023;28:13943–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4.
[14] Kim HJ. Conversational AI as an autonomous interlocutor: Evaluating the voice capabilities of generative models in improving EFL speaking fluency. Language Learning & Technology 2025;29:45–63.
[15] Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health 2000;23:334–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.
[16] Sandelowski M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health 2010;33:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362.
[17] Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2015;42:533–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
[18] Galletta A. Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York University Press; 2013.
[19] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
[20] Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press; 1978.
[21] Canale M, Swain M. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1980;1:1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rizki Rayana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
