Discourse Markers in the Introductory Section of Research Articles in National accredited Journal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v16i1.1171Keywords:
discourse markers, rhetorical moves, introductory section, research articlesAbstract
Discourse markers provide writers with signaling devices to connect ideas and guide readers in grasping the connection of ideas in the texts. An introductory section of a journal article represents a unique text which should be written with clear and interconnected arguments. This paper aims to reveal how discourse markers play vital roles in realizing the development of the arguments in this knotty text. To achieve this, introductory sections of articles published in a nationally accredited journal were examined. Using Fraser's (2009) functional classes of discourse markers, 22 introduction sections were analyzed employing text analysis to determine the usage of these markers. It was found that despite employing all types of discourse markers, not all of them were applied appropriately. Their uses may not be in line with their functional classification. Among others, there are three functional classes of discourse markers proposed by Fraser (2009), they are contrastive markers, elaborative markers, and inferential markers. Elaborative markers were the most used type among the different types, followed by contrastive and inferential markers. This implies that authors tended to develop ideas more often, whereas contrastive and inferential markers were used less frequently but were crucial for indicating differences and making conclusions within the texts.
References
Adewibowo, D. (2018). A study of discourse markers used in the theses background written by the students of English department of Bengkulu University (academic year December 2016). Journal of English Education and Teaching, 2(3), 89-97.
Akmal, S., Dhivah, I., & Mulia, M. (2020). Investigating students’ interest on reading journal articles: Materials, reasons and strategies. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 194-208.
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15358
Ali, E. A. M., & Mahadin, R. S. (2016). The use of discourse markers in written discourse by students of English at the University of Jordan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(3), 23–35.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847459
Alsaawi, A. (2022). Use of Discourse Markers among senior university students. Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 161–172.
https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.11
Annesley, T. M. (2010). Guide to Scientific Writing “ It was a cold and rainy night ”: Set the Scene with a Good Introduction. 713. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2010.143628
Aysu, S. (2017). The use of discourse markers in the writings of Turkish students of English as a foreign language: a corpus-based study. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 7(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2017.191
Codina, L. (2022). The IMRaD model of scientific articles: what is and how can be applied in the humanities and social sciences? Hipertext. net. 2022;(24): 98-103.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-1631
Fitriati, S. W., & Wahyuni, S. (2020). Introducing students with lexical bundles to improve academic writing: students’ learning experiences and perceptions. in ICLLT 2019: proceedings of the 1st international conference on language and language teaching, ICLLT 2019, 12 October, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia (p. 223). European Alliance for Innovation.
Fraser, B. (2009). An account of discourse markers. International Review of Pragmatics, 1(2), 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909x12538045489818
Al Gurkosh, J. H. A., & Badie, M. M. (2016). An investigation on the role of discourse markers in the quality of the descriptive compositions of Iraqi ELT students. Journal of Humanity Sciences, 20(4), 19-25.
Haninda, M., & Bram, B. (2022). Academic writing of EFL students’ undergraduate theses: A discourse marker analysis. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i1.19719
Jafarinejad, R., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). Investigating the relationship between discourse markers , language proficiency and reading comprehension : a case of some Iranian university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1526–1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.324
Jimola, F. E., & Dada, E. M. (2023). Use of discourse markers in ESL undergraduates’ expository essay writing among undergraduates in a Nigerian university. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 11(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijellr.13/vol11n42542
Karimah, N. A., Munir, A., & Anam, S. (2021). The use of discourse markers in the background of thesis proposals written by postgraduate students. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research, 04(01), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.37500/ijessr.2021.4111
Kurniawan, E., Dallyono, R., & Cahyowati, A. (2019). Exploring logical connectors in journals with different indexing levels: A comparison between international and national indexed journals. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i1.16088
Lu, H., Dahunog, I. L., Morales, J. R., & Ranain, N. (2022). The writing makers of college students: A discourse analysis. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 12(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2022.372
Nirwana, N. (2022). The student’s accuracy in using discourse markers for academic writing (a case study of students in English and literature department. Exposure : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 11(2), 287–304.
https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v11i2.8728
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A Textbook for Teachers-Prentice Hall (1991).
Pasaribu, T. A. (2017a). Male and Female Students’ Use of Textual Discourse Markers in Writing Academic Essays. Journal of Language and Literature, 17(1), 74–81.
https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.2017.170108
Patriana, A. W., Rachmajanti, S., & Mukminatien, N. (2016). Students’ ability in using discourse markers to build coherence in compositions. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 27(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v27i2/203-216
Peh, W. (2008). Effective medical writing. Singapore Medical Journal, 49(8), 607–609.
Rabab’ah, G., Ma’touq, A., & Alghazo, S. (2022). Discourse markers in narrative essays: A case study of Jordanian high school EFL learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 14(1), 203–217
https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.14.1.11
Rahayati, N., & Herlina, R. (2021). Discourse markers in abstracts of international journals. Journal of English Education Program (JEEP), 8(2), 107.
https://doi.org/10.25157/(jeep).v8i2.6426
Raputri, E., Pratama, H., & Hartono, R. (2022). Evaluating the use of discourse markers in selected English education journal articles. English Education Journal, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i1.52252
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.
Tadayyon, M., & Vasheghani Farahani, M. (2017). Exploring discourse markers used in academic papers: A comparative corpus-based inquiry of Iranian and English native writers. Iranian EFL Journal, 13(2), 130-150.
Tikham, S. (2022). Analysis of discourse markers in Thai EFL students’ essay writing: A case study of a university in Northern Thailand. Rajapark Journal, 16(46), 50-66.
Vickov, G., & Jakupčević, E. (2017). Discourse markers in non-native EFL teacher talk. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 649–671.
https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.4.5
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
Yehia, T. (2015). Use of discourse markers: A case study of English writing by Yemeni students. Language in India, 15(6), 217-235.
Yulianto. (2021). Discourse markers in news articles of the Jakarta post. J-SHMIC : Journal of English for Academic, 8(1), 66–76. https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/jshmic/article/view/3905
