Strategies in Reading English Web-Novels on Wattpad

Authors

  • Ismi Nur Wulandari Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Rahayu Apriliaswati Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Yanti Sri Rezeki Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v15i1.336

Keywords:

Digital Reading Strategies, Extensive Reading, Online Reading Strategies, Wattpad, Web-novels

Abstract

Motivated by the popularity of online reading on Wattpad, this research was conducted to investigate the metacognitive awareness of digital and online reading strategies to 39 undergraduate students who read English Web-novels on Wattpad. Additionally, the researcher explored the potential influence of English proficiency (TOEFL) and field of study, as well as the specific features of Wattpad that aid in their reading experience. Employing a quantitative survey and adapting the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Study Inventory (MARSI) developed by Mokhtari et al. (2018). The findings indicated that participants had a moderate level of strategies when reading English web-novels on Wattpad (M = 3.42). Problem Solving Reading Strategies were the most used (M = 3.80), followed by Global Reading Strategies (M = 3.73) and Support Reading Strategies (M = 2.73). English proficiency and field of study did not significantly impactful, with all groups showing similar levels (M = 3.4). Additionally, interactive features were not considered helpful (M = 2.51 and M = 2.23, respectively), while description and figure attachment features were frequently used (M = 4.15 and M = 3.25, respectively). The results indicated a necessity to integrate specific strategies, like incorporating Global Reading Strategies for pre-reading tasks and utilizing Problem Solving Strategies during reading activities, within EFL instruction. The research highlighted the obstacles encountered by both learners and instructors in the process of teaching and acquiring reading skills. It suggested that incorporating these strategies could effectively tackle comprehension challenges and improve overall language proficiency

References

Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1816–1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023

Alzu’bi, M. A. (2014). The effects of an extensive reading program on improving English as foreign language proficiency in university level education. 7(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n1p28

Anderson, N. J. (2003). Scrolling, clicking, and reading English: Online reading strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix, 3(3), 1–15.

Anggitasari, M., Tarwana, W., Febriani, R. B., & Syafriadin. (2020). View of using wattpad to Promote the students’ responses to literary works : EFL college students’ Perspectives and Experiences of enjoying short stories. Journal of Development and Innovation in Language and Literature Education, 1(2), 182–192.

Baron, N. S. (2015). The case against e-readers: Why reading paper books is better for your mind. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/01/12/the-case-against-kindle-why-reading-paper-books-is-better-for-your-mind-and-body/

Beglar, D., Hunt, A., & Kite, Y. (2012). The Effect of pleasure reading on Japanese University EFL learners’ reading rates. Language Learning, 62(3), 665–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00651.x

Brun-Mercer, N. (2019). Online reading strategies for the classroom. English Teaching Forum, 57(4), 2–11. americanenglish.state.gov/english-teaching-forum

Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research : Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of efl university students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026

Do, H. M., & Phan, H. L. T. (2021). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies on second language vietnamese undergraduates. Arab World English Journal, 12(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.7

Fatiloro, O. F., Adesola, O. A., Hameed, B. A., & Adewumi, O. M. (2017). A survey on the reading habits among colleges of education students in the information age. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 106–110.

Goodwin, A. P., Cho, S. J., Reynolds, D., Brady, K., & Salas, J. (2020). Digital versus paper reading processes and links to comprehension for middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 57(4), 1837–1867. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219890300

Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x

Henderson, E. (2015). The active reader: Strategies for academic reading and writing (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Hong-Nam, K., & Page, L. (2014). Investigating metacognitive awareness and reading strategy use of EFL Korean university students. Reading Psychology, 35(3), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2012.675418

Ishihara, T., & Ono, A. (2013). The effects of literary texts on students’ sentence recognition: Translation tasks and comprehension tasks. In M. Teranishi, Y. Saito, & K. Wales (Eds.), Literature and language learning in the EFL classroom (Vol. 53, Issue 9, pp. 140–149). Palgrave.

Janah, K. E. N., Retnaningdyah, P., & Mustofa, A. (2022). Digital extensive reading in Indonesia: A critical review. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 513. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.918

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.

Jusoh, Z., & Abdullah, L. (2015). Online survey of reading strategies (OSORS): Students’ online reading in academic context. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjde2015.17.2.5

Kucirkova, N., & Cremin, T. (2017). Personalised reading for pleasure with digital libraries : Towards a pedagogy of practice and design. Cambridge Journal of Education, 3577(October), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1375458

Mesgar, M., Abu Bakar, N., & Amir, Z. (2012). Online strategies postgraduate ESL readers of academic texts used. 2(10), 1779–1794.

Mikulecky, B. S., & Jeffries, L. (2007). Advance reading power. Pearson.

Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2 Special Issue), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.3

Nasu, M. (2015). The role of literature in foreign language learning. In M. Teranishi, Y. Saito, & K. Wales (Eds.), Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom (pp. 229–247). Palgrave.

Nation, I. S. P., & Waring, R. (2020). Teaching extensive reading in another language. Routledge.

Nichols, M. (2016). Reading and studying on the screen: An overview of literature towards good Learning design practice. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 20(1), 33–43. http://www.jofdl.nz/index.%0Aphp/JOFDL/article/view/263/200.

Omar, N. A. (2014). Online metacognitive reading strategies use by postgraduate Libyan EFL students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(7), 2289–2292.

Paul, A. M. (2013). Reading literature makes us smarter and nicer. Ideas Time. https://ideas.time.com/2013/06/03/why-we-should-read-literature/

Pennington, M. C., & Waxler, R. P. (2017). Why reading books still matters. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315210247

Permatasari, I., Wijayanto, A., & Kristina, D. (2020). The strengths and weaknesses of extensive reading using Wattpad; Students’ perceptions. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(2), 373. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v5i2.292

Pookcharoen, S. (2010). Metacognitive online reading strategies among Thai EFL university students. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 71(2-A), 455. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2010-99151-068&site=ehost-live

Poole, A. (2013). Fiction reading strategies of college readers. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 43(2), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2013.10850368

Rahman, F., Pattu, M. A., & Tammasse. (2019). Trends in reading literary fiction in print and cyber media. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.72.66.77

Rainey, E. C. (2016). Disciplinary literacy in english language arts: Exploring the social and problem-based nature of Literary reading and reasoning. Reading Research Quarterly, 0(0), 1–19.

Rashidi, N., & Piran, M. (2011). The effect of extensive and intensive reading on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary size and depth. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.2.471-482

Renandya, W. A. (2017). Should you be teaching reading intensively or extensively? In D. Shaffer & M. Pinto (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Korea TESOL International Conference: Shaping the Future: With 21st Century Skills (pp. 31–39). KOTESOL.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman language teaching & applied linguistic (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Ro, E., & Kim, H. (2021). The effects of extensive reading on young Korean students ’ construction development.

Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Baffoe-Djan, J. B. (2020). Data collection research methods in applied linguistics. Bloomsburry Academic.

Sari, D. P. (2016). The effects of short story through Wattpad on reading comprehension achievement of non- English major students of Bina Darma University. Holistics Journal, 8(16 Des), 1–42.

Thongwichit, N., & Buripakdi, A. (2021). View of a glimpse of metacognitive reading strategy instruction through modeling technique in ESP class at the tertiary level. LEARN Journal : Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 118–145.

Whitten, C., Labby, S., & Sullivan, S. L. (2016). The impact of pleasure reading on academic success. The Journal of Multidisciplinary Graduate Research, 2(4), 48–64.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-15

Issue

Section

Articles