Students' Voices on the Implementation of Gen-AI Feedback in EFL Writing Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v17i2.3644Keywords:
Generative AI feedback, EFL writing, Students' voices, Feedback literacy, Learner autonomyAbstract
The proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (Gen-AI) in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing instruction has sparked considerable scholarly interest, yet the subjective experiences and voices of learners who engage with AI-generated feedback remain insufficiently explored within the extant literature. This qualitative study investigates students' voices concerning the implementation of Gen-AI feedback in an EFL writing classroom, specifically examining their perceptions, patterns of engagement, development of feedback literacy, and the inherent tensions between learner autonomy and technological dependency. Adopting a qualitative research design, data were collected through four focus group discussions involving 30 purposively selected undergraduate students enrolled in an EFL writing course at a private university in Surakarta. Thematic analysis of the transcribed discussions, conducted in accordance with Braun and Clarke's (2006) framework, yielded five interrelated themes: perceived usefulness of Gen-AI feedback, patterns of feedback engagement, development of feedback literacy, tension between autonomy and dependency, and emotional and ethical responses. The findings reveal that students perceived Gen-AI feedback as highly useful for enhancing writing quality, revision efficiency, and idea generation; however, they did not passively accept all AI-generated suggestions but rather demonstrated selective engagement, critically evaluating feedback based on its relevance to higher-order writing concerns, including content and organization. Additionally, participants reported developing feedback literacy over time, evidenced by increased awareness of their writing weaknesses and improved capacity to interpret and strategically utilize AI feedback. Nevertheless, uneven development across participants indicated that feedback literacy does not emerge automatically through mere exposure to Gen-AI tools. A critical tension also emerged between learner autonomy and dependency, with several students expressing over-reliance on AI for revision tasks. Emotional and ethical responses included heightened confidence alongside scepticism regarding AI accuracy and concerns pertaining to academic integrity. The findings suggest that the pedagogical effectiveness of Gen-AI feedback is not determined solely by its technological affordances but is significantly mediated by learners' engagement, critical awareness, and feedback literacy. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that understanding students' voices is crucial for developing context-sensitive and pedagogically sound AI integration strategies, with implications for educators and curriculum designers seeking to implement Gen-AI feedback in effective, ethical, and learner-centred ways.
References
Abdelhalim, S. M., Alsahil, A. A., Baek, C., & Warschauer, M. (2025). University EFL instructors’ engagement with generative AI: A cross-cultural analysis. System, 135, 103861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103861
Aljasser, A. (2025). Investigating EFL students’ perceptions of feedback: A comparative study of instructor and ChatGPT-generated responses in academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(16), 22967–22988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13649-8
Almusharraf, A., Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Alotaibi, T. (2025). Students’ perceptions of generative AI in EFL writing: Strategies, self-efficacy, satisfaction and behavioural intention. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10045
Anwer, B. (2025). Trust in ChatGPT and Perceived Academic Writing Improvement: A TAM-based Quantitative Study in a ESL Context. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 10(1), 162–177.
Asadi, M., Ebadi, S., & Mohammadi, L. (2025). The impact of integrating ChatGPT with teachers’ feedback on EFL writing skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, 101766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101766
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cengiz, B. C., Bilki, Z., Ataş, A. H., & Celik, B. (2025). Exploring second language writers’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: Revision behaviors and perceptions. System, 134, 103837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103837
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2025). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Research_Design.html?hl=id&id=335ZDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Damayanti, F. P., & Sumedi, S. H. (2025). EXPLORING GENERATIVE AI IN ACADEMIC WRITING: EFL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS AND EXPERIENCES. Cirebon International Conference on Educationa and Science, 1(1), 385–398.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. 13(3), 319-340.
Ding, L., Zou, D., & Kohnke, L. (2025). ChatGPT as an automated writing evaluation tool: How students perceive it and how it affects their writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(18), 26777–26799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13775-3
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
Helm, G., & Hesse, F. (2026). Frontiers | Revising with AI: Aligning feedback technologies with learners’ revision processes. 11(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1702406
Hu, X., & Gong, W. (2025). Modeling Chinese EFL learners’ intention to use generative AI for L2 writing through an integrated model of the TAM and TTF. Education and Information Technologies, 30(13), 18157–18179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13505-9
Huang, J., Mizumoto, A., & Huang, Y. L. (2026). Comparing Peer Feedback and Generative Artificial Intelligence Feedback in Japanese English as a Foreign Language Speaking Context: Impacts on Motivation, Engagement, and Writing Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 1696–1707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70020
Kang, S., & Kim, M. (2026). AI-generated feedback in an EAP writing classroom: The collaborative process of feedback, uptake, and revision quality. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 80, 101639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101639
Khoso, A. K., Honggang, W., & Darazi, M. A. (2025). Trust and attitude towards AI as pathways to creativity: A TAM Model study of EFL students’ digital literacy and AI acceptance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06362-x
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Li, H., & Ji, W. (2026). Exploring User Experience of AI Teaching Assistant Systems Through an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Proceedings of the 2026 International Conference on Big Data and Informatization Education, ICBDIE ’26, 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1145/3806980.3807056
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9(4), 289–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Liu, J., Shi, Z., & Li, W. (2026). Developing students’ feedback literacy in disciplinary academic writing through generative artificial intelligence. Assessing Writing, 68, 101030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2026.101030
Lu, D. (Jason), & Zeng, Y. (2026). Leveraging self-regulated learning to develop L2 students’ feedback literacy in GenAI-mediated writing environments: An intervention study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2653887
Ma, X., Zhang, C., & Lee, I. (2026). L2 learners’ engagement with AI-generated feedback on writing. Assessing Writing, 68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2026.101020
Mekheimer, M. (2025a). Generative AI-assisted feedback and EFL writing: A study on proficiency, revision frequency and writing quality. Discover Education, 4(1), 170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00602-7
Mekheimer, M. (2025b). Generative AI-assisted feedback and EFL writing: A study on proficiency, revision frequency and writing quality. Discover Education, 4(1), 170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00602-7
Mekheimer, M. A. (2025). Beyond Text in the EFL Digital Landscape Exploring Power, Identity, and Culture in Post-COVID-19 Online Learning Communities. Discover Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00496-5
Meng, Y., Cui, Y., Geng, X., & Cao, Y. (2025). Exploring Feedback Literacy in L2 Students’ Academic Writing: Insights from their Reported Engagement with GenAl for Typical Revision Activities. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-01051-4
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. CA: Wiley.
Nguyen, T. N., Tran, T. K. H., Bui, T. H. H., Le, T. T. H., & Duong, T. K. H. (2026). Determinants of GenAI Tools Acceptance for English learning among Vietnamese EFL Engineering Students. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 27(2), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.54855/callej.262724
Núñez, R. P., & Larreta-Azelain, M. D. C. D. (2025). The impact of using ChatGPT for feedback in EFL writing: A systematic review. Revista Internacional de Lenguas Extranjeras / International Journal of Foreign Languages, (23), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.17345/rile23.4221
Park, J. (2026). AI Feedback Literacy and Learner Agency: A Judgment Ownership Framework. Korea Open Access Journals(KOAJ), 75, 135–153. https://doi.org/10.15755/jfs.2026..75.135
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (Fourth edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Polakova, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101
Setiawan, F., & Alkhowarizmi, A. (2025). Exploring an Artificial Intelligence as Automated Feedback Program in EFL Writing. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 16(1), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v16i1.1206
Shan, Z., Shan, M., Ding, L., & Su, Y. (2026). Unraveling EFL students’ technology self-efficacy, emotions and behavioral intentions in leveraging large language models: The serial mediation of perceptions and attitudes. BMC Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04812-y
Su, H., Tong, Y., Zhang, X., & Fan, Y. (2024). Uncovering Students’ Processing Tactics Towards ChatGPT’s Feedback in EFL Education Using Learning Analytics. 14797. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4442-8_18
Teng, M. F., & Huang, J. (2026). Assessing ChatGPT Feedback for EFL Learners’ Engagement and Writing Performance. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70155
Tran, T. T. T. (2025). Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences. Education Sciences, 15(2), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020232
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Wang, J., & Guo, K. (2025). Impacts of GenAI-assisted collaborative prewriting on university EFL students’ interactions with GenAI, outline quality, and task motivation. System, 135, 103857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103857
Wang, L., Zou, B., Wang, C., & Huang, F. (2025). Understanding learner motivation and intention to use ChatGPT for English language learning. Discover Computing, 28(1), 293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-025-09805-w
Xue, L., Mahat, J., & Ghazali, N. (2026). (PDF) Technology Acceptance Model in Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Meta-Analysis. SAGE Open, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251409441
Yang, W., & Lin, C. (2025). Translanguaging with generative AI in EFL writing: Students’ practices and perceptions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 67, 101181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101181
Zhang, Y., & Lin, Y. (2026). Emotional Fluctuations in AI-Enhanced Ecosystems: Exploring EFL Learners’ Affective States During AI Technology Adoption. European Journal of Education, 61(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70687
Zhang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2026). Designing ChatGPT-mediated feedback activities in EFL writing: A design-based study of the dialogic feedback triangle. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.121046
Zhang, Z., Aubrey, S., Guo, Z., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2026). How L2 Learners Negotiate Meaning in GenAI-Supported Creative Writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70256
