Constructing Motivational Meaning through Self-Mention Markers in Joshua Hong’s UNESCO Speeches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v17i2.4040Keywords:
self-mention markers, interactional metadiscourse, motivational meaning, Joshua Hong, UNESCO SpeechesAbstract
Motivational speeches by public figures play a critical role in inspiring audiences, fostering engagement, and promoting social responsibility. This study investigates how self-mention markers contribute to the construction of motivational meaning in Joshua Hong’s UNESCO speeches. Guided by Hyland’s (2005) interactional metadiscourse framework, a qualitative discourse analysis was conducted on two speeches delivered at the UNESCO Youth Forum (2023) and the Goodwill Ambassador for Youth Nomination Ceremony (2024). A total of 93 self-mention markers were identified, with we, our, and us being the most frequent. Four main functions were found: constructing collective identity, expressing commitment and responsibility, sharing personal experiences and authenticity, and highlighting perseverance and struggle. The findings indicate that motivational meaning is discursively constructed through these markers, fostering solidarity, credibility, collective responsibility, and resilience among audiences. Self-mention markers thus function as central interpersonal resources in motivational discourse, highlighting the role of strategic speaker positioning in shaping audience engagement and motivation.References
Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English.
Åhlvik, T., Bergeå, H., Rödl, M. B., & Hallgren, L. (2024). When hope messages become the discursive norm: how repertoires of hope shape communicative capacity in conversations on the circular economy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(9), 2017-2034. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2270144
Angraini, R., & Effrianti, M. D. (2020). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers in speeches of Minister for Foreign Affairs of Indonesia. Literary Criticism, 7(1), 1-10.
Bullock, O. M., Shulman, H. C., & Huskey, R. (2021). Narratives are persuasive because they are easier to understand: examining processing fluency as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 719615. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.719615
Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Diffani, H., & Hikmah, H. (2023). An analysis of illocutionary acts found in aespa speech at the united nation. Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguistics, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.31316/eltics.v8i2.5276
Dininta, R. S., Zaki, A. H., & Putra, A. D. (2023). Celebrity involvement in peace negotiation: Critical discourse analysis on Angelina Jolie’s speech at United Nations peacekeeping ministerial 2019. MANU Jurnal Pusat Penataran Ilmu dan Bahasa (PPIB), 34(2), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.51200/manu.v34i2.4770
Dong, J., & Zhang, M. (2026). Stance beyond words: How TED speakers construct stance through multimodal semiotic resources. English for Specific Purposes, 81, 150-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2025.10.001
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2023). Self-mention in L2 (Czech) learner academic discourse: Realisations, functions and distribution across master's theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101272
El-Masry, M. M. S. E. (2020). Ethos, logos and pathos: Metadiscourse markers and the construction of persuasion in some selected speeches of UNICEF’s goodwill ambassadors. CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Education, 71(1), 155-187. https://doi.org/10.21608/opde.2020.159771
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.
Farghal, M., & Kalakh, B. (2019). Engagement in translation: Interactional metadiscourse markers in American presidential debates. Jordan journal of modern languages and literatures, 12(1), 103-122.
Hasanah, U., Alek, A., & Hidayat, D. N. (2019). a Critical Discourse Analysis of Rm’ S Speech. Jurnal Humaniora Teknologi, 5(2), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.34128/jht.v5i2.60
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2016). “We must conclude that…”: A diachronic study of academic engagement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003
Kapranov, O. (2024). Self-mentions in climate change discourse by King Charles III. Journal of Contemporary Philology. https://doi.org/10.37834/JCP2471029k
Kapranov, O. (2025). Self-mentions in British prime minister's speeches on climate change. Language: Codification Competence Communication. https://doi.org/10.24025/2707-0573.12.2025.343342
Kashiha, H. (2022). On persuasive strategies: Metadiscourse practices in political speeches. Discourse and Interaction, 15(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2022-1-77
Koukpossi, A. O. (2024). Exploring metadiscourse devices in George Weah's inaugural speech. AKIRI: Revue des Sciences Humaines et Sociales, Lettres, Langues et Civilisations, 7(1), 13–25.
Liu, J., & Li, S. (2025). A study on the persuasive functions of interactional metadiscourse in TED Talks. Theory and Practice of Science and Technology, 6(6), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.47297/taposatWSP2633-456908.20250606
Martin, J. (2022). Rhetoric, discourse and the hermeneutics of public speech. Politics, 42(2), 170-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720933779
Sherwani, K. A. (2020). A cognitive positive discourse analysis of English motivational speeches. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(9), 4078-4091.
Ushioda, E. (2016). Language learning motivation through a small lens: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 49(4), 564-577. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000173
Ushioda, E., & Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Beyond global English: Motivation to learn languages in a multicultural world: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 451-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12407
Yang, X. (2023). A Study of Interactional Metadiscourse Features in Chinese University Students' Prepared English Speech. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 6(5), 97-103. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.5.11
Zhang, X., Wang, B., Zhang, L., Pu, Y., & Kong, X. Z. (2026). Successful public speaking enhances neural alignment in audience language networks. Neurobiology of Language, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/NOL.a.218
